"We've already seen proliferation. We started it with Britain, then France. Then we benignly let the Israelis do it. The Pakistanis and the Indians have recently done it. The Chinese have nuclear weapons"
About this Quote
Odom is doing something soldiers-turned-strategists often do when they want to puncture moral posturing: he converts nuclear proliferation from an abstract menace into a bureaucratic chain of choices, each one made with a straight face. The repeated “then” reads like a casualty list, but for policy decisions. It’s not lyrical; it’s ledger-like. That’s the point. He’s arguing that proliferation isn’t an invasion of the system, it’s a feature of how the system has been run.
The most loaded adverb is “benignly.” It’s an acid little word that implies both complicity and self-deception. The West didn’t merely “fail” to prevent Israel; it chose a posture of indulgence because Israel served strategic interests and because ambiguity was politically convenient. Odom’s subtext is that nonproliferation rhetoric tends to be selective enforcement dressed up as principle, and selective enforcement teaches the wrong lesson: get the bomb quietly, align with the right patrons, and you may be tolerated.
Context matters: Odom spoke from inside the Cold War national security establishment, where nuclear weapons were treated as tools of deterrence and alliance management, not just apocalypse machines. His list also undercuts the comforting story that proliferation is driven primarily by “rogue” ambition. Britain and France are named first to remind you that status, sovereignty, and prestige were always central motives, even for democracies.
The sentence stops short of a moral verdict, which is its rhetorical power. It leaves the listener sitting with an uncomfortable implication: if “we” helped normalize the club, we can’t credibly act shocked when new members apply.
The most loaded adverb is “benignly.” It’s an acid little word that implies both complicity and self-deception. The West didn’t merely “fail” to prevent Israel; it chose a posture of indulgence because Israel served strategic interests and because ambiguity was politically convenient. Odom’s subtext is that nonproliferation rhetoric tends to be selective enforcement dressed up as principle, and selective enforcement teaches the wrong lesson: get the bomb quietly, align with the right patrons, and you may be tolerated.
Context matters: Odom spoke from inside the Cold War national security establishment, where nuclear weapons were treated as tools of deterrence and alliance management, not just apocalypse machines. His list also undercuts the comforting story that proliferation is driven primarily by “rogue” ambition. Britain and France are named first to remind you that status, sovereignty, and prestige were always central motives, even for democracies.
The sentence stops short of a moral verdict, which is its rhetorical power. It leaves the listener sitting with an uncomfortable implication: if “we” helped normalize the club, we can’t credibly act shocked when new members apply.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List
