"We've been very bad at understanding why the right-wing does things"
About this Quote
The line works because it flips the usual posture. Rather than framing conservatism as mere ignorance or bad faith, Acker hints at motive, pleasure, and payoff: order as comfort, hierarchy as identity, punishment as clarity, nostalgia as a usable drug. “Does things” is blunt on purpose; it refuses the safe abstraction of “policies” and centers action, strategy, and force. It’s also an indictment of liberal narrative-making: if you can’t describe the opponent’s incentives accurately, you can’t counter them. You end up shadowboxing a caricature.
Context matters. Acker came up in an era when the New Right learned to fuse grievance with media savvy, turning culture war into a mass entertainment format. As an activist and transgressive writer, she understood that politics is partly about affect - fear, disgust, pride, longing - and that ignoring those drives doesn’t make you virtuous, it makes you unprepared. The quote isn’t an olive branch; it’s a demand for analytical ruthlessness.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Acker, Kathy. (2026, January 16). We've been very bad at understanding why the right-wing does things. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/weve-been-very-bad-at-understanding-why-the-119673/
Chicago Style
Acker, Kathy. "We've been very bad at understanding why the right-wing does things." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/weve-been-very-bad-at-understanding-why-the-119673/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We've been very bad at understanding why the right-wing does things." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/weve-been-very-bad-at-understanding-why-the-119673/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.



