"We've got ballots flying around, being counted by hand, arriving by truck and in God knows whose custody"
About this Quote
Ballots don’t “fly around” unless you want people to picture chaos. Axelrod’s line is engineered to trigger a very particular civic fear: that the most sacred object in a democracy is suddenly loose, analog, and unaccountable. The imagery is tactile and slightly panicked - paper in motion, hands counting, trucks hauling, custody unknown. It’s not a policy critique; it’s a mood-setting shot that makes disorder feel visible.
The intent is twofold. First, it telegraphs urgency: a system under strain where normal procedures are either breaking down or being publicly perceived as breaking down. Second, it preloads suspicion without alleging a specific crime. “God knows whose custody” is a rhetorical masterstroke of plausible deniability: no names, no accusation, just the insinuation that the chain of custody - the boring bureaucratic backbone of legitimacy - has been compromised. The phrase invites the audience to fill in the villain.
Context matters. Axelrod, a veteran Democratic strategist and Obama-era insider, speaks from a world where elections are both governance and narrative warfare. The subtext isn’t simply “count carefully.” It’s “confidence is collapsing in real time, and that collapse is itself dangerous.” Hand counting can be a safeguard, but paired with “flying around” it becomes a symbol of regression: modern democracy reduced to improvisation and logistics.
What makes it work is its asymmetry. It sounds like a procedural complaint, but it functions like a cultural alarm bell. In an era when legitimacy is litigated on cable news and social media before courts ever weigh in, the scariest allegation is the one that remains conveniently unprovable: that nobody is fully in control.
The intent is twofold. First, it telegraphs urgency: a system under strain where normal procedures are either breaking down or being publicly perceived as breaking down. Second, it preloads suspicion without alleging a specific crime. “God knows whose custody” is a rhetorical masterstroke of plausible deniability: no names, no accusation, just the insinuation that the chain of custody - the boring bureaucratic backbone of legitimacy - has been compromised. The phrase invites the audience to fill in the villain.
Context matters. Axelrod, a veteran Democratic strategist and Obama-era insider, speaks from a world where elections are both governance and narrative warfare. The subtext isn’t simply “count carefully.” It’s “confidence is collapsing in real time, and that collapse is itself dangerous.” Hand counting can be a safeguard, but paired with “flying around” it becomes a symbol of regression: modern democracy reduced to improvisation and logistics.
What makes it work is its asymmetry. It sounds like a procedural complaint, but it functions like a cultural alarm bell. In an era when legitimacy is litigated on cable news and social media before courts ever weigh in, the scariest allegation is the one that remains conveniently unprovable: that nobody is fully in control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
