"We've got to be responsible, somebody's got to be responsible for it"
About this Quote
"We've got to be responsible, somebody's got to be responsible for it" is the kind of sentence that sounds like leadership until you notice how carefully it dodges the noun. Responsible for what, exactly? The line is built like a sandbag wall: repetitive, blunt, and defensive. "We've got to" carries the urgency of a unit under pressure, but it also spreads the burden into a foggy collective. Then it narrows to "somebody's got to" - not me, not you, just somebody - a phrase that pretends to demand accountability while quietly bargaining for distance from it.
Coming from a soldier, the intent reads as both moral and procedural. Militaries run on responsibility as a chain: orders are given, actions are taken, reports are filed. But the subtext suggests a moment when that chain has snapped or become inconvenient. This is the language people reach for after something irreversible: civilian harm, a botched operation, friendly fire, the slow rot of negligence. It's a verbal triage attempt: contain the chaos by insisting there must be an accountable party, even if the speaker can't (or won't) name them.
The repetition does emotional work. It mimics the self-talk of someone trying to steady themselves, to turn shame or grief into bureaucracy. The quote captures a familiar wartime paradox: the institution demands responsibility, the reality incentivizes plausible deniability. In eight words, it stages the struggle between conscience and command structure - and shows how accountability can be invoked as a ritual even when it's being evaded.
Coming from a soldier, the intent reads as both moral and procedural. Militaries run on responsibility as a chain: orders are given, actions are taken, reports are filed. But the subtext suggests a moment when that chain has snapped or become inconvenient. This is the language people reach for after something irreversible: civilian harm, a botched operation, friendly fire, the slow rot of negligence. It's a verbal triage attempt: contain the chaos by insisting there must be an accountable party, even if the speaker can't (or won't) name them.
The repetition does emotional work. It mimics the self-talk of someone trying to steady themselves, to turn shame or grief into bureaucracy. The quote captures a familiar wartime paradox: the institution demands responsibility, the reality incentivizes plausible deniability. In eight words, it stages the struggle between conscience and command structure - and shows how accountability can be invoked as a ritual even when it's being evaded.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List




