"We've probably gotten 500 calls from people saying what the heck is going on with gas, and I gotta say I agree with you. What the heck is going on with gas?"
About this Quote
Napolitano’s line is the sound of government trying to borrow the public’s frustration before the public borrows its pitchforks. The repetition of “what the heck” isn’t just folksy emphasis; it’s a rhetorical move that collapses the distance between officialdom and the person staring at a pump that’s suddenly demanding rent money. By opening with “we’ve probably gotten 500 calls,” she’s staging a feedback loop: the outrage is measurable, documented, already in the building. It’s a preemptive defense against the suspicion that leaders are insulated from the price shock.
The subtext is more interesting than the sentiment. She’s not offering an explanation, much less a solution; she’s offering alignment. “I gotta say I agree with you” functions as a kind of political mirroring, a way to say: I’m on your side, even if I’m also part of the system you’re blaming. That’s a delicate stance when the actual causes of gas spikes are sprawling (markets, geopolitics, refining capacity, speculation) and don’t map cleanly onto a villain a politician can safely name in one sentence.
Contextually, the quote lands in a familiar American cycle: fuel prices rise, anger metastasizes, leaders race to translate complex energy economics into a simple posture of empathy and urgency. Napolitano’s choice of informal language is strategic. It signals that this isn’t a technocratic memo; it’s a cultural moment when people feel squeezed, and politics becomes a contest over who sounds most convincingly baffled on their behalf.
The subtext is more interesting than the sentiment. She’s not offering an explanation, much less a solution; she’s offering alignment. “I gotta say I agree with you” functions as a kind of political mirroring, a way to say: I’m on your side, even if I’m also part of the system you’re blaming. That’s a delicate stance when the actual causes of gas spikes are sprawling (markets, geopolitics, refining capacity, speculation) and don’t map cleanly onto a villain a politician can safely name in one sentence.
Contextually, the quote lands in a familiar American cycle: fuel prices rise, anger metastasizes, leaders race to translate complex energy economics into a simple posture of empathy and urgency. Napolitano’s choice of informal language is strategic. It signals that this isn’t a technocratic memo; it’s a cultural moment when people feel squeezed, and politics becomes a contest over who sounds most convincingly baffled on their behalf.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Janet
Add to List




