"What can be indissoluble if a perpetual Union, made more perfect, is not?"
About this Quote
The line lands like a lawyer’s closing argument disguised as a hymn. Salmon P. Chase takes the Constitution’s own self-mythology - “a more perfect Union” - and turns it into a weapon against secession: if the American experiment can’t be “indissoluble,” what possibly could be? The question isn’t seeking an answer. It’s a dare, a trapdoor. To concede the Union can be dissolved is to admit the Founding’s language was ornamental, not binding.
Chase’s intent is both constitutional and moral. “Perpetual Union” invokes the Articles of Confederation and the idea that the United States is not a casual partnership but a continuing political body. “Made more perfect” adds a crucial twist: the Union isn’t just enduring; it’s improving by design. That phrasing frames disunion as regression, not merely disagreement - an abandonment of a national trajectory toward greater coherence and capacity.
The subtext is aimed at the secessionists’ preferred story: that states freely entered, therefore states may freely leave. Chase counters with a different ontology. The Union is presented as something that, once constituted, becomes bigger than its component parts - like citizenship, public debt, or a court judgment. You can violate it, but you can’t simply opt out of it without unraveling the legitimacy of everything built atop it.
Context matters: Chase, an antislavery politician and later Lincoln’s Treasury Secretary and Chief Justice, is speaking from the crisis atmosphere where rhetoric had to do real work. This sentence tries to make permanence feel not like coercion, but like the only intellectually honest reading of the American promise.
Chase’s intent is both constitutional and moral. “Perpetual Union” invokes the Articles of Confederation and the idea that the United States is not a casual partnership but a continuing political body. “Made more perfect” adds a crucial twist: the Union isn’t just enduring; it’s improving by design. That phrasing frames disunion as regression, not merely disagreement - an abandonment of a national trajectory toward greater coherence and capacity.
The subtext is aimed at the secessionists’ preferred story: that states freely entered, therefore states may freely leave. Chase counters with a different ontology. The Union is presented as something that, once constituted, becomes bigger than its component parts - like citizenship, public debt, or a court judgment. You can violate it, but you can’t simply opt out of it without unraveling the legitimacy of everything built atop it.
Context matters: Chase, an antislavery politician and later Lincoln’s Treasury Secretary and Chief Justice, is speaking from the crisis atmosphere where rhetoric had to do real work. This sentence tries to make permanence feel not like coercion, but like the only intellectually honest reading of the American promise.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Salmon
Add to List





