"What does that represent? There was never any question in plastic art, in poetry, in music, of representing anything. It is a matter of making something beautiful, moving, or dramatic - this is by no means the same thing"
About this Quote
Leger swings a hammer at the cozy assumption that art is a mirror held up to the world. His opening question, "What does that represent?", arrives like an irritated heckle from the gallery floor, the kind that treats painting as a decoding exercise: spot the subject, extract the message, go home satisfied. He answers with a provocation: in the arts that matter to him - plastic art, poetry, music - representation was never the central job. The point is not to reproduce the visible world but to produce an experience.
The subtext is a defense of modernism at the exact moment it was being tried in the court of public opinion. Leger, a Cubist who embraced the machine age's hard edges and industrial rhythms, watched audiences demand that art behave like illustration: legible, referential, obedient. His rebuttal reframes the stakes. "Making something beautiful, moving, or dramatic" is not a vague appeal to prettiness; it's a claim that form itself can carry force. Rhythm, composition, color, dissonance, fragmentation - these aren't decorative choices but the engine of meaning.
That last clause, "this is by no means the same thing", is the knife twist. Leger is warning that representation can be a shortcut that flatters the viewer's literacy while bypassing sensation. A painting can depict a factory and still be dead on arrival; another can show almost nothing recognizable and feel more truthful to modern life. He's not denying reality. He's insisting that reality reaches us through structure, tempo, and shock - and that art earns its keep by designing those hits, not by labeling the objects in the room.
The subtext is a defense of modernism at the exact moment it was being tried in the court of public opinion. Leger, a Cubist who embraced the machine age's hard edges and industrial rhythms, watched audiences demand that art behave like illustration: legible, referential, obedient. His rebuttal reframes the stakes. "Making something beautiful, moving, or dramatic" is not a vague appeal to prettiness; it's a claim that form itself can carry force. Rhythm, composition, color, dissonance, fragmentation - these aren't decorative choices but the engine of meaning.
That last clause, "this is by no means the same thing", is the knife twist. Leger is warning that representation can be a shortcut that flatters the viewer's literacy while bypassing sensation. A painting can depict a factory and still be dead on arrival; another can show almost nothing recognizable and feel more truthful to modern life. He's not denying reality. He's insisting that reality reaches us through structure, tempo, and shock - and that art earns its keep by designing those hits, not by labeling the objects in the room.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Fernand
Add to List
