"What I write is not for little girls"
About this Quote
A gauntlet tossed with a flourish: Gautier draws a hard border around his art and dares the reader to cross it. “What I write is not for little girls” isn’t really about children; it’s about the category “little girls” as 19th-century shorthand for the sentimental, the moralizing, the safely decorous. He’s rejecting the era’s expectation that literature should edify, tame, and reassure - a jab at the bourgeois demand that art behave like a governess.
The line works because it’s both snobbish and strategic. By choosing a figure society coded as innocent and impressionable, Gautier implies his writing is unfit for polite drawing rooms: too sensuous, too pagan, too aesthetically committed to pleasure over lesson. That’s the engine of his broader program, “art for art’s sake,” where beauty is not a delivery system for virtue. The provocation doubles as brand management: he’s manufacturing an audience by excluding one, turning taste into a test of maturity.
The subtext also carries a gendered insult that modern readers can’t unsee. “Little girls” is deployed as a stand-in for weakness, frivolity, and squeamishness - a cultural reflex that flatters the male connoisseur while policing women’s readership. Gautier’s elegance comes with that sharp edge: the sentence is short, almost dainty, but it enforces hierarchy. It’s a poet insisting that art is allowed to be useless, erotic, difficult - and that if that makes you clutch your pearls, you were never the intended public.
The line works because it’s both snobbish and strategic. By choosing a figure society coded as innocent and impressionable, Gautier implies his writing is unfit for polite drawing rooms: too sensuous, too pagan, too aesthetically committed to pleasure over lesson. That’s the engine of his broader program, “art for art’s sake,” where beauty is not a delivery system for virtue. The provocation doubles as brand management: he’s manufacturing an audience by excluding one, turning taste into a test of maturity.
The subtext also carries a gendered insult that modern readers can’t unsee. “Little girls” is deployed as a stand-in for weakness, frivolity, and squeamishness - a cultural reflex that flatters the male connoisseur while policing women’s readership. Gautier’s elegance comes with that sharp edge: the sentence is short, almost dainty, but it enforces hierarchy. It’s a poet insisting that art is allowed to be useless, erotic, difficult - and that if that makes you clutch your pearls, you were never the intended public.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Theophile
Add to List






