"What if you threw a protest and no one showed up? The lack of angst and anger and emotion is a big positive"
About this Quote
Panic, reframed as good news: Sekulow takes the old anti-war punchline ("What if they gave a war and nobody came?") and repurposes it to deflate dissent. The rhetorical move is neat and a little sly. By casting an empty protest as evidence of public calm, he turns absence into endorsement. No crowds? Then no crisis. No anger? Then no legitimate grievance. It is less an observation than a preemptive verdict on what counts as political reality.
The intent is legal-and-media savvy: shift the frame from the substance of the complaint to the optics of the complainants. Protest becomes a mood metric, not a democratic tool. "Angst and anger and emotion" are treated as contaminants, implying that if people were truly rational they would stay home. That is a familiar posture in establishment argumentation: passion is irrational; order is virtue; silence is consent. It also smuggles in a standard protesters can never meet. Show up, and you're "emotional". Don't, and your cause is nonexistent.
Context matters because Sekulow operates at the junction of litigation, partisan messaging, and constitutional rhetoric. The line reads like a televised talking point aimed at neutralizing headlines, not engaging claims. Its subtext: legitimacy comes from quiet compliance, and the healthiest polity is one that doesn't make noise. That's comforting for power, less so for anyone who remembers that rights are often secured by the very "anger" being dismissed.
The intent is legal-and-media savvy: shift the frame from the substance of the complaint to the optics of the complainants. Protest becomes a mood metric, not a democratic tool. "Angst and anger and emotion" are treated as contaminants, implying that if people were truly rational they would stay home. That is a familiar posture in establishment argumentation: passion is irrational; order is virtue; silence is consent. It also smuggles in a standard protesters can never meet. Show up, and you're "emotional". Don't, and your cause is nonexistent.
Context matters because Sekulow operates at the junction of litigation, partisan messaging, and constitutional rhetoric. The line reads like a televised talking point aimed at neutralizing headlines, not engaging claims. Its subtext: legitimacy comes from quiet compliance, and the healthiest polity is one that doesn't make noise. That's comforting for power, less so for anyone who remembers that rights are often secured by the very "anger" being dismissed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jay
Add to List






