"What I'm not saying is that all government spending is bad. It's not - far, far from it, but there is no free lunch, as a former colleague of mine used to say. There is no public tooth fairy. Father Christmas does not work on the Treasury staff this year. You can never bail someone out of trouble without putting someone else into trouble"
About this Quote
Laffer’s real move here isn’t the warning about deficits; it’s the demolition of a comforting fantasy. By stacking folksy characters - “free lunch,” “public tooth fairy,” “Father Christmas” - he turns fiscal policy into a morality play where believing in painless rescue is childish. The humor is blunt, almost dad-joke on purpose: it’s a rhetorical ambush designed to make the opposing view sound unserious before it can even speak.
The intent is disciplinary. Laffer concedes a narrow point (“not all government spending is bad”) to sound reasonable, then snaps the frame back to scarcity: every bailout, every stimulus check, every emergency program has a payer. That’s the subtextual pivot from policy debate to ethical accounting. He’s not just saying government should spend less; he’s saying politicians sell spending by pretending costs are invisible, deferred, or magically absorbed by “the Treasury.” The line “You can never bail someone out…without putting someone else into trouble” is crafted to recast redistribution as harm, not help, and to suggest that even compassionate interventions are zero-sum.
Context matters: Laffer is a flagship figure of supply-side economics, the school that popularized tax cuts as growth engines and treated government expansion as a drag on productive activity. In that tradition, the greatest sin isn’t spending itself but the illusion that the state can conjure resources without distorting incentives or shifting burdens. The quote works because it’s not technical; it’s memetic. It equips audiences with a set of sticky images that turn complex fiscal tradeoffs into common sense - and makes anyone arguing otherwise sound like they’re waiting for Santa.
The intent is disciplinary. Laffer concedes a narrow point (“not all government spending is bad”) to sound reasonable, then snaps the frame back to scarcity: every bailout, every stimulus check, every emergency program has a payer. That’s the subtextual pivot from policy debate to ethical accounting. He’s not just saying government should spend less; he’s saying politicians sell spending by pretending costs are invisible, deferred, or magically absorbed by “the Treasury.” The line “You can never bail someone out…without putting someone else into trouble” is crafted to recast redistribution as harm, not help, and to suggest that even compassionate interventions are zero-sum.
Context matters: Laffer is a flagship figure of supply-side economics, the school that popularized tax cuts as growth engines and treated government expansion as a drag on productive activity. In that tradition, the greatest sin isn’t spending itself but the illusion that the state can conjure resources without distorting incentives or shifting burdens. The quote works because it’s not technical; it’s memetic. It equips audiences with a set of sticky images that turn complex fiscal tradeoffs into common sense - and makes anyone arguing otherwise sound like they’re waiting for Santa.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List
