"What is good for Germany is right, and everything that harms Germany is wrong"
About this Quote
A single sentence that tries to end argument by redefining morality as a border. Ley’s line is not patriotic uplift; it’s a blunt instrument, built to make ethics obedient. “Good for Germany” is left conveniently undefined, so the speaker gets to fill it in later with whatever the regime needs: rearmament, purges, censorship, expansion. The move is classic authoritarian rhetoric: swap principles for loyalty, then label dissent as injury.
The subtext is transactional and threatening. If “right” equals “beneficial,” then rights become conditional and people become resources. Harm to Germany can mean anything from foreign “enemies” to internal “saboteurs,” a category elastic enough to swallow unions, journalists, Jews, communists, anyone inconvenient. Ley, a key Nazi labor official who helped dismantle independent unions under the German Labour Front, had professional reasons to preach this kind of moral arithmetic: it converts coercion into civic duty and turns exploitation into national service.
Historically, the phrasing echoes the older nationalist maxim “Right or wrong, my country,” but strips even that of sentimentality. It’s colder: an equation, not a vow. In the 1930s and wartime Third Reich, this logic lubricated policies that required mass participation and selective blindness. Once “Germany” becomes the highest court, there is no appeal. That’s the sentence’s real intent: not to persuade, but to authorize.
The subtext is transactional and threatening. If “right” equals “beneficial,” then rights become conditional and people become resources. Harm to Germany can mean anything from foreign “enemies” to internal “saboteurs,” a category elastic enough to swallow unions, journalists, Jews, communists, anyone inconvenient. Ley, a key Nazi labor official who helped dismantle independent unions under the German Labour Front, had professional reasons to preach this kind of moral arithmetic: it converts coercion into civic duty and turns exploitation into national service.
Historically, the phrasing echoes the older nationalist maxim “Right or wrong, my country,” but strips even that of sentimentality. It’s colder: an equation, not a vow. In the 1930s and wartime Third Reich, this logic lubricated policies that required mass participation and selective blindness. Once “Germany” becomes the highest court, there is no appeal. That’s the sentence’s real intent: not to persuade, but to authorize.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
