"What is objectionable, what is dangerous about extremists, is not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant. The evil is not what they say about their cause, but what they say about their opponents"
About this Quote
Kennedy’s line pulls a neat rhetorical judo move: it refuses the lazy comfort of “moderation” as a personality trait and instead puts the moral spotlight on a behavior. Extremism, he suggests, can be wrong, but it can also be principled, visionary, even necessary in moments when the center is just the status quo with better branding. The real threat isn’t intensity; it’s intolerance. That distinction matters because it denies demagogues their favorite alibi: that they’re merely “passionate” or “telling hard truths.”
The subtext is a warning about how political violence gets culturally prepped. Movements don’t usually start by arguing for brutality; they start by redefining the opposition as illegitimate - traitors, animals, enemies of the people. Kennedy frames that shift as the telltale sign of danger: when a cause becomes less about what it wants to build and more about who it wants to punish, you’re no longer in the realm of debate but of permission structures for harm.
Placed in Kennedy’s era - civil rights battles, Cold War paranoia, and the country’s rising taste for conspiracy and scapegoating - the quote reads like an attempt to protect democratic conflict from turning existential. He’s not pleading for niceness. He’s drawing a boundary around pluralism: you can fight hard for justice, but the minute your rhetoric requires the other side to be unworthy of rights, you’re not arguing anymore. You’re recruiting.
The subtext is a warning about how political violence gets culturally prepped. Movements don’t usually start by arguing for brutality; they start by redefining the opposition as illegitimate - traitors, animals, enemies of the people. Kennedy frames that shift as the telltale sign of danger: when a cause becomes less about what it wants to build and more about who it wants to punish, you’re no longer in the realm of debate but of permission structures for harm.
Placed in Kennedy’s era - civil rights battles, Cold War paranoia, and the country’s rising taste for conspiracy and scapegoating - the quote reads like an attempt to protect democratic conflict from turning existential. He’s not pleading for niceness. He’s drawing a boundary around pluralism: you can fight hard for justice, but the minute your rhetoric requires the other side to be unworthy of rights, you’re not arguing anymore. You’re recruiting.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List







