"What men call accident is God's own part"
About this Quote
Bailey, a Victorian poet with a taste for cosmic scale, is writing into a 19th-century atmosphere thick with providential thinking and theological debate. Industrial modernity was accelerating, science was sharpening its tools, and “accident” was becoming a plausible explanation for more of life. The line pushes back, insisting that the apparent messiness of existence is not evidence against order but evidence of an order too large for human perception.
The subtext is both consoling and coercive. Consoling, because it offers meaning where life feels like a roulette wheel; coercive, because it discourages the moral move of calling an outcome “just bad luck” and moving on. If God owns the accidents, then human beings don’t get to treat them as neutral. You’re invited to interpret, to submit, to see contingency as a kind of message.
It works because it’s compact theology disguised as common sense: one stark redefinition that turns the modern shrug into a spiritual confrontation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Bailey, Philip James. (2026, January 17). What men call accident is God's own part. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-men-call-accident-is-gods-own-part-57796/
Chicago Style
Bailey, Philip James. "What men call accident is God's own part." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-men-call-accident-is-gods-own-part-57796/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"What men call accident is God's own part." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-men-call-accident-is-gods-own-part-57796/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.











