"What office is there which involves more responsibility, which requires more qualifications, and which ought, therefore, to be more honorable, than that of teaching?"
About this Quote
Martineau doesn’t flatter teachers so much as indict everyone else. By framing teaching as an “office” - a word that smuggles in civic duty, institutional authority, and public trust - she drags the work out of the sentimental corner where societies like to place it (“nurturing,” “natural,” often feminized) and into the realm where status and pay are supposed to follow responsibility. The sentence is a trap: once you accept the premise that teaching carries exceptional responsibility, you’re forced to confront the uncomfortable corollary that it should be treated as exceptionally honorable. If it isn’t, the failure belongs to the culture, not the classroom.
Her trio of escalating clauses is doing political work. “More responsibility” points to consequence: teachers shape citizens, not just students. “More qualifications” pushes back against the patronizing idea that anyone who knows a subject can teach it, a convenient myth for underpaying the labor. “More honorable” is the moral lever - honor as a currency societies claim to prize even when they won’t spend actual money.
The context matters: Martineau wrote in a century obsessed with reform, literacy, and the manufacturing of “respectable” social order, while also limiting women’s professional legitimacy. Elevating teaching reads as both progressive and strategic: one of the few acceptable public roles for women becomes, in her hands, a benchmark for what a serious profession looks like. The subtext is clear-eyed: a nation that mouths reverence for education while treating teachers as expendable is confessing its priorities.
Her trio of escalating clauses is doing political work. “More responsibility” points to consequence: teachers shape citizens, not just students. “More qualifications” pushes back against the patronizing idea that anyone who knows a subject can teach it, a convenient myth for underpaying the labor. “More honorable” is the moral lever - honor as a currency societies claim to prize even when they won’t spend actual money.
The context matters: Martineau wrote in a century obsessed with reform, literacy, and the manufacturing of “respectable” social order, while also limiting women’s professional legitimacy. Elevating teaching reads as both progressive and strategic: one of the few acceptable public roles for women becomes, in her hands, a benchmark for what a serious profession looks like. The subtext is clear-eyed: a nation that mouths reverence for education while treating teachers as expendable is confessing its priorities.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teacher Appreciation |
|---|
More Quotes by Harriet
Add to List


