"What people want is not what some would call imaginative and often austere productions but very lavish productions which cast back into the auditorium an image of their affluence"
About this Quote
Miller is slicing through the polite fiction that audiences go to the theater to be challenged. He frames the public’s appetite as conspicuously conservative: not for “imaginative” work that might be spare, risky, or formally strange, but for “very lavish productions” that function like a mirror. The key verb is “cast back” - theater as a projection machine for status, reflecting the crowd’s wealth back at them as spectacle, reassurance, and proof.
The subtext is less about taste than about self-recognition. Lavishness isn’t just expensive; it’s legible. Big sets, opulent costumes, star casting - these are cultural receipts. They let patrons feel that their ticket price (and by extension their place in the social order) has been validated. Miller’s dry phrasing (“what some would call”) also jabs at the language of arts advocacy, where “imaginative” is treated as an unarguable virtue. He’s implying that this rhetoric can be naïve, even manipulative, if it pretends audiences are primarily seeking austerity’s moral uplift.
Context matters: Miller spent decades in British cultural life, moving between theater, opera, television, and comedy, often insisting that intelligence and accessibility don’t have to be enemies. Here he’s diagnosing an arts economy in which institutions chase prestige and box office by packaging luxury as “culture.” The line lands because it’s an uncomfortable reversal: the stage isn’t elevating the audience; the audience is commissioning a flattering portrait of itself.
The subtext is less about taste than about self-recognition. Lavishness isn’t just expensive; it’s legible. Big sets, opulent costumes, star casting - these are cultural receipts. They let patrons feel that their ticket price (and by extension their place in the social order) has been validated. Miller’s dry phrasing (“what some would call”) also jabs at the language of arts advocacy, where “imaginative” is treated as an unarguable virtue. He’s implying that this rhetoric can be naïve, even manipulative, if it pretends audiences are primarily seeking austerity’s moral uplift.
Context matters: Miller spent decades in British cultural life, moving between theater, opera, television, and comedy, often insisting that intelligence and accessibility don’t have to be enemies. Here he’s diagnosing an arts economy in which institutions chase prestige and box office by packaging luxury as “culture.” The line lands because it’s an uncomfortable reversal: the stage isn’t elevating the audience; the audience is commissioning a flattering portrait of itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jonathan
Add to List

