"What standards are upheld by the scientific community affect the community internally, and also affect its relations with society at large, including Congress"
About this Quote
Standards are never just housekeeping; they are power. Serge Lang, writing as a mathematician who repeatedly prodded his own field to police itself, frames “standards” as the hidden infrastructure that decides whether science can credibly speak beyond its seminar rooms. The line’s first move is internal: what a community tolerates, rewards, or quietly ignores shapes its culture, its hiring, its peer review, its willingness to challenge celebrity findings. Lang’s subtext is that “the scientific community” is not a disembodied engine of truth; it’s a guild with incentives, status games, and the ever-present temptation to close ranks.
Then comes the sharper edge: those internal norms radiate outward into politics. By naming Congress, Lang isn’t gesturing at “the public” in the abstract; he’s pointing to the concrete arena where budgets, regulation, and legitimacy are negotiated. Scientific credibility becomes a kind of political currency. If standards slip, the cost isn’t merely a few flawed papers. It’s an opening for lawmakers to treat science as just another interest group, to fund or defund it as a matter of ideology, patronage, or retaliation. Conversely, if standards are demonstrably strict and self-correcting, Congress has fewer excuses to meddle or to stage performative skepticism.
The quote works because it refuses the comforting story that science and society are separate spheres. Lang compresses a whole theory of institutional trust into one sentence: rigor is not only epistemic virtue; it’s public strategy.
Then comes the sharper edge: those internal norms radiate outward into politics. By naming Congress, Lang isn’t gesturing at “the public” in the abstract; he’s pointing to the concrete arena where budgets, regulation, and legitimacy are negotiated. Scientific credibility becomes a kind of political currency. If standards slip, the cost isn’t merely a few flawed papers. It’s an opening for lawmakers to treat science as just another interest group, to fund or defund it as a matter of ideology, patronage, or retaliation. Conversely, if standards are demonstrably strict and self-correcting, Congress has fewer excuses to meddle or to stage performative skepticism.
The quote works because it refuses the comforting story that science and society are separate spheres. Lang compresses a whole theory of institutional trust into one sentence: rigor is not only epistemic virtue; it’s public strategy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Serge
Add to List


