"What the Democrats don't seem to understand is that higher taxes mean fewer American jobs and less American production"
About this Quote
Westmoreland’s line is less an economic argument than a framing device: it recasts “higher taxes” from a policy lever into a moral offense against the nation’s paycheck. The key move is linguistic compression. “Higher taxes” becomes an automatic chain reaction - fewer jobs, less production - skipping the messy middle where rates vary, loopholes multiply, and businesses respond to demand as much as to tax bills. By collapsing cause and effect into a single sentence, he offers certainty in a domain where certainty is politically useful and empirically contested.
The opening jab, “What the Democrats don’t seem to understand,” isn’t aimed at persuading Democrats. It’s a performance for Republicans and swing voters who already suspect elites and technocrats are either naive or dishonest. He implies that the opposition’s ignorance is the problem, not competing values. That’s a classic congressional weapon: delegitimize the other side’s competence so you don’t have to litigate their goals (funding services, paying down debt, redistributing burden).
The patriotic repetition - “American jobs,” “American production” - turns a tax dispute into a loyalty test. It also preemptively answers the obvious counterpoint: government spending can create jobs, and certain taxes target the wealthy more than firms. By planting “American” twice, he positions private-sector growth as the only legitimate kind of prosperity, while making public investment sound faintly foreign or parasitic.
The context is the post-1980s conservative gospel: taxes are a brake, markets are the engine. The line works because it sells an identity - pro-worker, pro-nation - while quietly making “tax cuts” synonymous with “job creation,” no spreadsheet required.
The opening jab, “What the Democrats don’t seem to understand,” isn’t aimed at persuading Democrats. It’s a performance for Republicans and swing voters who already suspect elites and technocrats are either naive or dishonest. He implies that the opposition’s ignorance is the problem, not competing values. That’s a classic congressional weapon: delegitimize the other side’s competence so you don’t have to litigate their goals (funding services, paying down debt, redistributing burden).
The patriotic repetition - “American jobs,” “American production” - turns a tax dispute into a loyalty test. It also preemptively answers the obvious counterpoint: government spending can create jobs, and certain taxes target the wealthy more than firms. By planting “American” twice, he positions private-sector growth as the only legitimate kind of prosperity, while making public investment sound faintly foreign or parasitic.
The context is the post-1980s conservative gospel: taxes are a brake, markets are the engine. The line works because it sells an identity - pro-worker, pro-nation - while quietly making “tax cuts” synonymous with “job creation,” no spreadsheet required.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lynn
Add to List


