"What the public needs to understand is that these new technologies, especially in recombinant DNA technology, allow scientists to bypass biological boundaries altogether"
About this Quote
There is a quiet sleight of hand in Rifkin's phrasing: he doesn’t say recombinant DNA lets scientists cross biological boundaries; he says it lets them bypass them. "Cross" suggests struggle, negotiation, maybe even humility before the complexity of living systems. "Bypass" is a highway metaphor - engineering over ecology, speed over deliberation. The sentence is built like a warning delivered in the voice of a public educator, and that’s the point. Rifkin positions himself as translator between a scientific priesthood and a supposedly under-informed public, implying that the real problem isn’t just the tech, it’s the asymmetry of understanding around it.
The intent is partly democratic ("the public needs to understand") and partly prosecutorial: it frames recombinant DNA not as incremental lab work but as a civilizational threshold. "Altogether" does heavy lifting, amplifying the sense that normal limits have dissolved. Subtext: if boundaries can be bypassed, then the old moral and regulatory categories - species, naturalness, containment, even "playing God" - become obsolete or dangerously porous. That’s a potent move because it shifts the debate from safety data to governance: who gets to decide what counts as acceptable life-editing, and under what incentives?
Context matters. Rifkin rose to prominence in late-20th-century fights over biotech and patents on life, when gene splicing was moving from experimental novelty to commercial pipeline. His rhetoric anticipates today’s CRISPR anxieties, but with a pre-CRISPR edge: the fear isn’t just new power, it’s new speed, deployed by institutions optimized for profit and prestige, not restraint.
The intent is partly democratic ("the public needs to understand") and partly prosecutorial: it frames recombinant DNA not as incremental lab work but as a civilizational threshold. "Altogether" does heavy lifting, amplifying the sense that normal limits have dissolved. Subtext: if boundaries can be bypassed, then the old moral and regulatory categories - species, naturalness, containment, even "playing God" - become obsolete or dangerously porous. That’s a potent move because it shifts the debate from safety data to governance: who gets to decide what counts as acceptable life-editing, and under what incentives?
Context matters. Rifkin rose to prominence in late-20th-century fights over biotech and patents on life, when gene splicing was moving from experimental novelty to commercial pipeline. His rhetoric anticipates today’s CRISPR anxieties, but with a pre-CRISPR edge: the fear isn’t just new power, it’s new speed, deployed by institutions optimized for profit and prestige, not restraint.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jeremy
Add to List