"What tipped the scales was that psychology involved working with rats"
About this Quote
The subtext is a quiet critique of how academic disciplines sell themselves. Psychology, especially in Schwartz’s mid-century orbit, often meant behaviorism: measurable inputs and outputs, a world where “human nature” was approached through lever presses and pellets. Schwartz’s quip punctures the romance of that approach. It implies a preference for the messier, more direct contact with people that education and the humanities promise, where you don’t have to use an animal proxy to talk about human suffering or desire.
There’s also a moral tremor under the joke. Discomfort with animal experimentation can be an early sign of the empathy Schwartz later became known for: an educator’s instinct to meet pain face-to-face, not translate it into data. By admitting the petty, sensory reason he swerved paths, he makes a larger point: our “vocations” are often decided by small, embodied aversions, not big philosophical awakenings.
Quote Details
| Topic | Career |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Schwartz, Morrie. (2026, January 18). What tipped the scales was that psychology involved working with rats. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-tipped-the-scales-was-that-psychology-5175/
Chicago Style
Schwartz, Morrie. "What tipped the scales was that psychology involved working with rats." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-tipped-the-scales-was-that-psychology-5175/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"What tipped the scales was that psychology involved working with rats." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-tipped-the-scales-was-that-psychology-5175/. Accessed 20 Feb. 2026.





