"What was taken by force, can only be restored by force"
About this Quote
The context is the post-1948 Arab-Israeli order and, more sharply, the shock of 1967. After the Six-Day War, Arab publics were asked to swallow humiliation while their leaders recalibrated. Nasser’s rhetoric refuses that digestion. It converts defeat into a temporary condition and recasts recovery as moral necessity, not strategic preference. The phrase “can only” matters as much as “force”; it’s a constraint masquerading as realism, meant to discipline internal dissent as much as to threaten an external opponent.
Subtext: legitimacy flows from action. Nasser’s Egypt built its identity on anti-colonial struggle and sovereignty, and this sentence smuggles that anti-imperial template into the regional conflict. If territory was “taken by force,” then reclaiming it by force becomes not aggression but restoration, a return to proper ownership. That reframing is rhetorically potent because it offers dignity on demand: it tells an injured audience that the world’s moral balance won’t be repaired by pleading. It will be repaired by power.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Nasser, Gamal Abdel. (2026, January 14). What was taken by force, can only be restored by force. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-was-taken-by-force-can-only-be-restored-by-125477/
Chicago Style
Nasser, Gamal Abdel. "What was taken by force, can only be restored by force." FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-was-taken-by-force-can-only-be-restored-by-125477/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"What was taken by force, can only be restored by force." FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-was-taken-by-force-can-only-be-restored-by-125477/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.












