"What we are witnessing now is a clash of civilisations, not just between states but within them"
About this Quote
The intent is clarifying and polarizing. By describing cultural conflict as internal, Fortuyn gives moral permission for harder lines on multiculturalism: if the conflict is existential, compromise looks like surrender. The subtext is that liberal democracies are uniquely vulnerable because they host the very plurality that, in this framing, threatens their cohesion. It’s a neat rhetorical trap: tolerance becomes naivete; procedural politics becomes avoidance.
Context matters. Fortuyn was a Dutch politician who surged in the early 2000s by attacking multicultural policies and warning about political Islam, and he was assassinated in 2002 at the height of his rise. That moment - post-9/11 anxieties, European debates over immigration, and a growing sense among some voters that elites were smoothing over real cultural friction - made a sweeping formulation like this feel less like theory and more like reportage. Its power comes from how it compresses messy social change into a single, dramatic storyline that demands choosing sides.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Fortuyn, Pim. (2026, January 15). What we are witnessing now is a clash of civilisations, not just between states but within them. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-we-are-witnessing-now-is-a-clash-of-161644/
Chicago Style
Fortuyn, Pim. "What we are witnessing now is a clash of civilisations, not just between states but within them." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-we-are-witnessing-now-is-a-clash-of-161644/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"What we are witnessing now is a clash of civilisations, not just between states but within them." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/what-we-are-witnessing-now-is-a-clash-of-161644/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.






