"What we have achieved is a good example of how the right policies deliver"
About this Quote
The line is engineered to sound like proof without offering any. “What we have achieved” invokes a collective victory lap, but it’s also a convenient fog machine: achieved by whom, measured how, at what cost? The phrase “a good example” pretends to modesty while quietly positioning the speaker as curator of reality, selecting one favorable case study and implying it generalizes. Then comes the real payload: “the right policies deliver.” “Right” does double duty, meaning both correct and (often) center-right, sliding ideology into the grammar as if it were simply common sense. “Deliver” is managerial and transactional, a verb from the world of services and quarterly reports, designed to reassure markets and swing voters alike that politics is just competent execution.
Rodrigo Rato’s career gives the sentence extra charge. As a leading figure in Spain’s Partido Popular and later head of the IMF, Rato became associated with the 1990s-2000s faith that liberalization, fiscal discipline, and technocratic stewardship could produce stable prosperity. Read in that light, the quote isn’t just self-congratulation; it’s a branding exercise for a whole governing philosophy: outcomes are framed as the natural return on correct policy choices, not the product of global tailwinds, inequality trade-offs, or lucky timing.
Its most strategic move is the elision of conflict. There are no losers, no dissenters, no mention of distribution - only “policies” that “deliver,” as if societies were logistics chains. That’s why it works: it converts contested governance into a performance metric, and invites the audience to treat politics like a scoreboard rather than an argument about values.
Rodrigo Rato’s career gives the sentence extra charge. As a leading figure in Spain’s Partido Popular and later head of the IMF, Rato became associated with the 1990s-2000s faith that liberalization, fiscal discipline, and technocratic stewardship could produce stable prosperity. Read in that light, the quote isn’t just self-congratulation; it’s a branding exercise for a whole governing philosophy: outcomes are framed as the natural return on correct policy choices, not the product of global tailwinds, inequality trade-offs, or lucky timing.
Its most strategic move is the elision of conflict. There are no losers, no dissenters, no mention of distribution - only “policies” that “deliver,” as if societies were logistics chains. That’s why it works: it converts contested governance into a performance metric, and invites the audience to treat politics like a scoreboard rather than an argument about values.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Rodrigo
Add to List



