"What we see depends mainly on what we look for"
About this Quote
Perception, Lubbock suggests, is not a neutral camera but a policy choice. “What we see depends mainly on what we look for” reads like a polite Victorian maxim, yet it carries the bracing implication that reality is negotiated in advance by attention: you don’t simply encounter the world, you pre-select it. The line works because it sounds observational while quietly assigning responsibility. If your society “sees” disorder, degeneracy, or threat everywhere, that may say less about the streets than about the search terms you’ve typed into public life.
Lubbock was not just a gentleman-philosopher; he was a statesman in an era when Britain’s institutions were busy classifying everything: the poor, the criminal, the “fit” and “unfit,” the colonies, the natural world. The late 19th century prized measurement and taxonomy, and that confidence could shade into moral certainty. His sentence, read in that context, is either a warning shot or a confession of method: governing often means deciding what counts as evidence, which problems are legible, which people are visible.
The subtext is unnervingly modern. Attention is power. “What we look for” can be curiosity, bias, compassion, or careerist incentive, and each produces a different world with different policy outcomes. The quote’s elegance lies in its double edge: it can humble the observer (“maybe I’m missing something”) or justify tunnel vision (“I found what I came to find”). In civic life, that’s the difference between reform and scapegoating, between seeing citizens and seeing suspects.
Lubbock was not just a gentleman-philosopher; he was a statesman in an era when Britain’s institutions were busy classifying everything: the poor, the criminal, the “fit” and “unfit,” the colonies, the natural world. The late 19th century prized measurement and taxonomy, and that confidence could shade into moral certainty. His sentence, read in that context, is either a warning shot or a confession of method: governing often means deciding what counts as evidence, which problems are legible, which people are visible.
The subtext is unnervingly modern. Attention is power. “What we look for” can be curiosity, bias, compassion, or careerist incentive, and each produces a different world with different policy outcomes. The quote’s elegance lies in its double edge: it can humble the observer (“maybe I’m missing something”) or justify tunnel vision (“I found what I came to find”). In civic life, that’s the difference between reform and scapegoating, between seeing citizens and seeing suspects.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: The Beauties of Nature and the Wonders of the World We Li... (John Lubbock, 1892)
Evidence: Page 4. Primary-source wording in the book is: “What we do see depends mainly on what we look for.” The commonly-circulated shorter form (“What we see depends mainly on what we look for”) is a slight paraphrase/truncation of the opening clause. The Project Gutenberg transcription shows the 1892 M... Other candidates (2) A Guidebook of Coaching High-performance Team (Chandan Lal Patary, 2022) compilation95.0% ... What we see depends mainly on what we look for.” – John Lubbock Seeing the bigger picture: Seeing the bigger pict... Elvis Presley (John Lubbock) compilation40.0% hat what are we going to do then in short what have you older folks provided for |
More Quotes by John
Add to List










