"What we've gone through in the last several years has caused some people to question 'Can we trust Microsoft?'"
About this Quote
Ballmer’s line is a corporate mea culpa that never quite says “we were wrong.” It opens with a vague, weather-system subject - “what we’ve gone through” - that blurs agency while still acknowledging damage. That phrasing matters: it invites the audience to supply the scandals and stumbles themselves, which makes the admission feel broader than any single incident and, conveniently, less litigable than naming specifics.
The quoted question, “Can we trust Microsoft?”, is the real payload. It’s staged as something “some people” are asking, a classic PR move that keeps the speaker above the fray while conceding the legitimacy of public doubt. Ballmer isn’t debating product quality; he’s diagnosing a trust deficit. In the early 2000s, Microsoft had become a symbol of both technical dominance and institutional overreach: antitrust battles, security crises like the worm era, and a growing sense that the company’s default mode was to win first and explain later. Trust, here, is shorthand for everything Microsoft had started to lack: transparency, user protection, humility.
The intent is to pivot the brand from feared monopoly to responsible steward without surrendering power. It’s also an argument about scale: when you’re the operating system of modern life, failures don’t stay private. Ballmer’s subtext is that Microsoft understands it’s no longer being judged merely as a company, but as infrastructure - and infrastructure is only tolerated when it’s reliable, secure, and accountable.
The quoted question, “Can we trust Microsoft?”, is the real payload. It’s staged as something “some people” are asking, a classic PR move that keeps the speaker above the fray while conceding the legitimacy of public doubt. Ballmer isn’t debating product quality; he’s diagnosing a trust deficit. In the early 2000s, Microsoft had become a symbol of both technical dominance and institutional overreach: antitrust battles, security crises like the worm era, and a growing sense that the company’s default mode was to win first and explain later. Trust, here, is shorthand for everything Microsoft had started to lack: transparency, user protection, humility.
The intent is to pivot the brand from feared monopoly to responsible steward without surrendering power. It’s also an argument about scale: when you’re the operating system of modern life, failures don’t stay private. Ballmer’s subtext is that Microsoft understands it’s no longer being judged merely as a company, but as infrastructure - and infrastructure is only tolerated when it’s reliable, secure, and accountable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Steve
Add to List


