"What white woman, however lonely, was ever captive or insulted by me? Yet they say I am a bad Indian"
About this Quote
A courtroom question disguised as a moral indictment, Sitting Bull’s line weaponizes the colonizer’s own favorite yardstick: the supposed protection of white womanhood. He isn’t just defending his personal conduct; he’s exposing how “bad Indian” functioned as a pre-written verdict, immune to evidence. The pointed specificity - “What white woman” - is the tell. In the frontier imagination, the image of the endangered white woman was propaganda with legs: it justified cavalry campaigns, land seizures, and the entire story of “civilization” advancing against “savagery.” Sitting Bull drags that fantasy into daylight and demands receipts.
The subtext is sharper than the surface modesty. By choosing the charge most likely to inflame settlers, he highlights the asymmetry of accountability. He is expected to answer for crimes he did not commit, while the larger violence - broken treaties, massacres, forced removals, starvation as policy - rarely faces cross-examination. “Yet they say” names the real mechanism: reputation as a colonial weapon. The label “bad” is not descriptive; it’s administrative, a way to make a man killable, his people removable.
Context matters: Sitting Bull spoke as a Lakota leader targeted for resisting U.S. expansion, especially after conflicts like the Great Sioux War era. The line isn’t a plea for acceptance; it’s a rhetorical reversal. He uses calm factuality to show how the moral narrative was rigged, then lets the contradiction do the violence.
The subtext is sharper than the surface modesty. By choosing the charge most likely to inflame settlers, he highlights the asymmetry of accountability. He is expected to answer for crimes he did not commit, while the larger violence - broken treaties, massacres, forced removals, starvation as policy - rarely faces cross-examination. “Yet they say” names the real mechanism: reputation as a colonial weapon. The label “bad” is not descriptive; it’s administrative, a way to make a man killable, his people removable.
Context matters: Sitting Bull spoke as a Lakota leader targeted for resisting U.S. expansion, especially after conflicts like the Great Sioux War era. The line isn’t a plea for acceptance; it’s a rhetorical reversal. He uses calm factuality to show how the moral narrative was rigged, then lets the contradiction do the violence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Sitting
Add to List
