"Whatever was the conduct of England, I am equally arraigned"
About this Quote
The intent is strategic. By tying his fate to “the conduct of England,” he collapses the distance between national policy and personal liability. Critics want to treat him as a uniquely corrupt operator; he reframes the attack as an assault on the government’s collective decisions, even on the nation’s course. It’s an early masterclass in prime-ministerial rhetoric: when the opposition demands a head, make them admit they’re really condemning an entire system.
The subtext is sharper: Walpole is pointing out that outcomes, not evidence, drive punishment. “Whatever” signals indifference to the particulars; the charge is predetermined. Coming from Britain’s first de facto prime minister, that cynicism is earned. His long tenure created a new target: the idea that one individual could be blamed for the messy compromises of state. Walpole’s line recognizes the modern predicament of executive power: you can’t centralize authority without centralizing resentment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Walpole, Robert. (2026, January 18). Whatever was the conduct of England, I am equally arraigned. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/whatever-was-the-conduct-of-england-i-am-equally-12100/
Chicago Style
Walpole, Robert. "Whatever was the conduct of England, I am equally arraigned." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/whatever-was-the-conduct-of-england-i-am-equally-12100/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Whatever was the conduct of England, I am equally arraigned." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/whatever-was-the-conduct-of-england-i-am-equally-12100/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.





