"Whatever you say it is, it isn't"
About this Quote
A philosopher of language disguised as a scientist, Korzybski is taking a scalpel to our favorite delusion: that naming something captures it. "Whatever you say it is, it isn't" lands like a paradox, but its real work is practical, almost hygienic. It’s a warning label for the mind. The sentence forces a split between the world and our talk about the world, and it does so with blunt, slightly annoying certainty - the kind that sticks precisely because it denies you the comfort of argument.
Korzybski’s context matters: early 20th-century faith in systems, measurement, and scientific clarity, alongside propaganda, mass media, and ideological churn. General Semantics, his project, tried to show how language habits quietly distort perception and decision-making. The quote is a compact version of his famous idea that "the map is not the territory". Any description is a reduction, and reduction is always lossy. The subtext is that certainty is often just a linguistic posture - a well-turned sentence standing in for contact with reality.
Its intent isn’t to make speech useless; it’s to make speakers modest. The sting is directed at labels that pretend to be final: "criminal", "genius", "failed state", "toxic". Once a label hardens, it starts running the show, steering policy, relationships, even self-concepts, while the messy particulars disappear. Korzybski’s line works because it’s both accusatory and freeing: you can still speak, but you’re obligated to remember you’re compressing the world, not possessing it.
Korzybski’s context matters: early 20th-century faith in systems, measurement, and scientific clarity, alongside propaganda, mass media, and ideological churn. General Semantics, his project, tried to show how language habits quietly distort perception and decision-making. The quote is a compact version of his famous idea that "the map is not the territory". Any description is a reduction, and reduction is always lossy. The subtext is that certainty is often just a linguistic posture - a well-turned sentence standing in for contact with reality.
Its intent isn’t to make speech useless; it’s to make speakers modest. The sting is directed at labels that pretend to be final: "criminal", "genius", "failed state", "toxic". Once a label hardens, it starts running the show, steering policy, relationships, even self-concepts, while the messy particulars disappear. Korzybski’s line works because it’s both accusatory and freeing: you can still speak, but you’re obligated to remember you’re compressing the world, not possessing it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Alfred
Add to List







