"What's new is that the White House itself has now been corporatized. It's not politicians working for the corporate interests. They are the corporate interests. That's where Bush came from, and Cheney and Rumsfeld"
About this Quote
Hightower isn’t diagnosing corruption so much as declaring a hostile takeover complete. The provocation hinges on a clean rhetorical flip: not “captured by” corporate power, but indistinguishable from it. That move matters because it drains the usual reformist fantasy that you can simply pressure politicians back into serving the public. If the state is staffed by executives, dealmakers, and defense-industry lifers, the conflict of interest isn’t a scandal; it’s the operating system.
The phrase “corporatized White House” borrows the language of mergers and reorg charts, implying a presidency run like a firm: metrics over meaning, secrecy as “proprietary information,” citizens recast as customers, and war treated as a procurement pipeline. Naming Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld isn’t just partisan finger-pointing; it’s a roster chosen for biography. In the early 2000s, Cheney’s Halliburton ties and Rumsfeld’s revolving-door resume made the Iraq era feel, to critics, like governance with a quarterly earnings mindset and a contractor’s incentives.
Subtext: stop pretending this is an ethical lapse that better rules will fix. Hightower is pushing a more unsettling claim about legitimacy, that democratic institutions can be hollowed out without a coup, just through staffing and culture. It’s also a populist dare: if you accept his premise, your target shifts from “lobbyists” to an entrenched political economy where public decisions are made by people who already speak corporate as their first language. That’s why the line lands: it’s less moral outrage than a reclassification of power.
The phrase “corporatized White House” borrows the language of mergers and reorg charts, implying a presidency run like a firm: metrics over meaning, secrecy as “proprietary information,” citizens recast as customers, and war treated as a procurement pipeline. Naming Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld isn’t just partisan finger-pointing; it’s a roster chosen for biography. In the early 2000s, Cheney’s Halliburton ties and Rumsfeld’s revolving-door resume made the Iraq era feel, to critics, like governance with a quarterly earnings mindset and a contractor’s incentives.
Subtext: stop pretending this is an ethical lapse that better rules will fix. Hightower is pushing a more unsettling claim about legitimacy, that democratic institutions can be hollowed out without a coup, just through staffing and culture. It’s also a populist dare: if you accept his premise, your target shifts from “lobbyists” to an entrenched political economy where public decisions are made by people who already speak corporate as their first language. That’s why the line lands: it’s less moral outrage than a reclassification of power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List



