"When a girl marries, she exchanges the attentions of many men for the inattention of one"
About this Quote
Rowland’s line lands like a cocktail-party laugh that curdles a second later. It’s built on a neat rhetorical swap: “attentions of many” becomes “inattention of one,” turning marriage from a romantic culmination into a downgrade in customer service. The joke works because it flatters two prejudices at once: that a woman’s pre-marital life is defined by male pursuit, and that a husband’s default setting is neglect. It’s not subtle; it’s efficient.
As a journalist writing in an era when marriage functioned as a primary economic and social destiny for women, Rowland is needling the institution from inside the only safe place available to many female writers: wit. The barb is aimed less at individual men than at the promise marriage sold. Courtship is depicted as a competitive market where attention is abundant; marriage is a monopoly where the “winner” stops trying. That’s the subtext: the system rewards performance before commitment, then normalizes emotional complacency after it.
There’s also a quietly radical edge. By describing attention as a kind of currency exchanged, Rowland frames romance as transaction, not fate. That framing exposes how gender roles script behavior: men perform attentiveness to secure a wife; wives are expected to accept whatever follows as the price of legitimacy.
The line survives because it still reads as recognizably modern: the fear that partnership can shrink your social world and dull your desirability. It’s not a timeless truth so much as a timeless anxiety, sharpened into a one-sentence indictment.
As a journalist writing in an era when marriage functioned as a primary economic and social destiny for women, Rowland is needling the institution from inside the only safe place available to many female writers: wit. The barb is aimed less at individual men than at the promise marriage sold. Courtship is depicted as a competitive market where attention is abundant; marriage is a monopoly where the “winner” stops trying. That’s the subtext: the system rewards performance before commitment, then normalizes emotional complacency after it.
There’s also a quietly radical edge. By describing attention as a kind of currency exchanged, Rowland frames romance as transaction, not fate. That framing exposes how gender roles script behavior: men perform attentiveness to secure a wife; wives are expected to accept whatever follows as the price of legitimacy.
The line survives because it still reads as recognizably modern: the fear that partnership can shrink your social world and dull your desirability. It’s not a timeless truth so much as a timeless anxiety, sharpened into a one-sentence indictment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marriage |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Helen
Add to List










