"When alien abductees recount to me their stories, I do not deny that they had a real experience"
About this Quote
Shermer’s line is a skeptic’s judo move: he grants the witness their lived reality while refusing to grant the preferred explanation. It’s a rhetorical concession with teeth. By saying he “does not deny” abductees had a “real experience,” he sidesteps the cheap thrill of debunking-by-mockery and instead targets the more interesting question: what, exactly, is “real” in human perception?
The intent is strategic empathy. Shermer has built a career arguing that belief often rides on cognitive bias, pattern-seeking, and the brain’s talent for turning ambiguity into narrative. This phrasing lets him meet people where their certainty lives - in memory, emotion, bodily sensation - without endorsing the extraterrestrial overlay. The subtext: sincerity is not evidence, and intensity is not accuracy. You can feel something utterly, even traumatically, and still be wrong about its cause.
Context matters because “alien abduction” stories sit at the intersection of sleep paralysis, hypnotherapy’s suggestibility, cultural scripts, and a media ecosystem that rewards the uncanny. Shermer’s sentence nods to the modern ethics of skepticism: the goal isn’t to humiliate believers; it’s to separate phenomenology (what happened in the mind/body) from ontology (what happened in the world). That distinction also protects skeptics from their own arrogance, acknowledging how ordinary brains generate extraordinary certainty.
The line works because it reframes the debate away from “Are you lying?” to “How does the mind manufacture conviction?” That’s a far more unsettling mystery - and, in Shermer’s hands, a more testable one.
The intent is strategic empathy. Shermer has built a career arguing that belief often rides on cognitive bias, pattern-seeking, and the brain’s talent for turning ambiguity into narrative. This phrasing lets him meet people where their certainty lives - in memory, emotion, bodily sensation - without endorsing the extraterrestrial overlay. The subtext: sincerity is not evidence, and intensity is not accuracy. You can feel something utterly, even traumatically, and still be wrong about its cause.
Context matters because “alien abduction” stories sit at the intersection of sleep paralysis, hypnotherapy’s suggestibility, cultural scripts, and a media ecosystem that rewards the uncanny. Shermer’s sentence nods to the modern ethics of skepticism: the goal isn’t to humiliate believers; it’s to separate phenomenology (what happened in the mind/body) from ontology (what happened in the world). That distinction also protects skeptics from their own arrogance, acknowledging how ordinary brains generate extraordinary certainty.
The line works because it reframes the debate away from “Are you lying?” to “How does the mind manufacture conviction?” That’s a far more unsettling mystery - and, in Shermer’s hands, a more testable one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
