"When community action was put into federal law in the early sixties as part of the effort to combat poverty and social injustice, I supported it intellectually"
About this Quote
There’s a tell in Barney Frank’s phrasing: “supported it intellectually.” For a politician, that’s a loaded qualifier, the kind that quietly separates moral agreement from political comfort. Frank is talking about the early-1960s moment when “community action” became federal policy through the War on Poverty, a New Deal-descended bet that Washington could fund local organizations, empower residents, and bypass ossified city halls. It was policy with an edge: money plus voice, aimed at poverty and “social injustice” in a country trying to metabolize civil rights in real time.
The intent here is to stake out a position that sounds principled while leaving room for ambivalence. “Intellectually” signals he can endorse the theory - participation, empowerment, anti-poverty spending - while implying that the practice got messy: neighborhood groups clashing with mayors, accusations of radicalism, bureaucratic friction, and the perennial backlash to federal government “interfering” locally. It’s a politician’s way of admitting the idea was right without being pinned to every consequence.
The subtext also nods to a familiar liberal dilemma: technocratic reform meets grassroots power. Community action wasn’t just service delivery; it threatened existing hierarchies by legitimizing poor people as political actors. Frank’s careful diction suggests respect for that disruptive premise, and an awareness of why it became controversial. In one restrained sentence, he evokes a whole era’s tension between lofty federal aims and the unruly democracy required to make them real.
The intent here is to stake out a position that sounds principled while leaving room for ambivalence. “Intellectually” signals he can endorse the theory - participation, empowerment, anti-poverty spending - while implying that the practice got messy: neighborhood groups clashing with mayors, accusations of radicalism, bureaucratic friction, and the perennial backlash to federal government “interfering” locally. It’s a politician’s way of admitting the idea was right without being pinned to every consequence.
The subtext also nods to a familiar liberal dilemma: technocratic reform meets grassroots power. Community action wasn’t just service delivery; it threatened existing hierarchies by legitimizing poor people as political actors. Frank’s careful diction suggests respect for that disruptive premise, and an awareness of why it became controversial. In one restrained sentence, he evokes a whole era’s tension between lofty federal aims and the unruly democracy required to make them real.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Barney
Add to List



