"When I announced the development of Perl 6, I said it was going to be a community design. I designed Perl, myself. It's limited by my own brain power. So I wanted Perl 6 to be a community design"
About this Quote
Larry Wall is doing something rare in tech: admitting that a language is an act of authorship and an act of ego, then deliberately prying his own fingers off the steering wheel. The first sentence frames Perl 6 as a public promise, almost a political campaign pledge: “community design” isn’t just a methodology, it’s a legitimacy play. He’s telling users, contributors, and skeptics that the next Perl won’t be a solo auteur sequel; it will be governed, argued over, and owned by more than the guy whose name is synonymous with the original.
Then comes the disarming self-critique: “It’s limited by my own brain power.” On the surface, it’s humility. Underneath, it’s a shrewd reframing of authority. Wall isn’t renouncing influence; he’s repositioning it. By naming his limits, he signals maturity and invites others to fill gaps without threatening his identity. The subtext: a language’s longevity depends less on brilliance than on succession planning.
Context matters: Perl’s earlier success came from a charismatic, opinionated design voice. But by the time Perl 6 was announced, the stakes had shifted. Open-source culture had made “benevolent dictator” leadership both common and contested, and new languages were competing on elegance, coherence, and community momentum. Wall’s line tries to convert potential fragmentation into a feature: disagreement as design fuel.
It also foreshadows Perl 6’s actual story - ambitious, sprawling, and slow. “Community design” is inspiring rhetoric, but it’s also a warning label: collective genius can broaden a language’s imagination, and simultaneously make it harder to ship.
Then comes the disarming self-critique: “It’s limited by my own brain power.” On the surface, it’s humility. Underneath, it’s a shrewd reframing of authority. Wall isn’t renouncing influence; he’s repositioning it. By naming his limits, he signals maturity and invites others to fill gaps without threatening his identity. The subtext: a language’s longevity depends less on brilliance than on succession planning.
Context matters: Perl’s earlier success came from a charismatic, opinionated design voice. But by the time Perl 6 was announced, the stakes had shifted. Open-source culture had made “benevolent dictator” leadership both common and contested, and new languages were competing on elegance, coherence, and community momentum. Wall’s line tries to convert potential fragmentation into a feature: disagreement as design fuel.
It also foreshadows Perl 6’s actual story - ambitious, sprawling, and slow. “Community design” is inspiring rhetoric, but it’s also a warning label: collective genius can broaden a language’s imagination, and simultaneously make it harder to ship.
Quote Details
| Topic | Coding & Programming |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Larry
Add to List





