"When I have been asked during these last weeks who caused the riots and the killing in L.A., my answer has been direct and simple: Who is to blame for the riots? The rioters are to blame. Who is to blame for the killings? The killers are to blame"
About this Quote
Quayle’s line is a masterclass in political minimalism: a tautology dressed up as moral clarity. By answering “Who is to blame?” with “The rioters are to blame,” he offers a kind of rhetorical closed circuit. It’s direct, it’s simple, and it’s engineered to end the conversation rather than open it. The repetition works like a gavel: case closed, no further testimony required.
The context matters. In the wake of the 1992 Los Angeles uprising, public debate wasn’t only about broken windows and burning buildings; it was about the videotaped beating of Rodney King, the acquittals that followed, long-running police misconduct, segregated poverty, and civic neglect. Quayle’s phrasing sidesteps that ecosystem of causation and replaces it with individual culpability. That’s not an accidental omission; it’s the point. He’s making a bid to reframe the story away from systemic failure and toward personal responsibility, a frame that was central to early-’90s law-and-order politics and a Republican counter-narrative to claims of institutional racism.
There’s also a subtle emotional appeal: anger needs a target, and Quayle supplies one with clean categories - “rioters,” “killers” - that feel morally incontestable. The cost is that he collapses explanation into condemnation. The line doesn’t argue; it asserts. It reassures listeners who want certainty, while implicitly casting structural critiques as excuses. In a moment defined by national discomfort, Quayle offers the comfort of a single, hard blame.
The context matters. In the wake of the 1992 Los Angeles uprising, public debate wasn’t only about broken windows and burning buildings; it was about the videotaped beating of Rodney King, the acquittals that followed, long-running police misconduct, segregated poverty, and civic neglect. Quayle’s phrasing sidesteps that ecosystem of causation and replaces it with individual culpability. That’s not an accidental omission; it’s the point. He’s making a bid to reframe the story away from systemic failure and toward personal responsibility, a frame that was central to early-’90s law-and-order politics and a Republican counter-narrative to claims of institutional racism.
There’s also a subtle emotional appeal: anger needs a target, and Quayle supplies one with clean categories - “rioters,” “killers” - that feel morally incontestable. The cost is that he collapses explanation into condemnation. The line doesn’t argue; it asserts. It reassures listeners who want certainty, while implicitly casting structural critiques as excuses. In a moment defined by national discomfort, Quayle offers the comfort of a single, hard blame.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Dan
Add to List



