"When I hear something going wrong, I insist on it being put right"
About this Quote
The line sells a fantasy of benevolent control: the boss as civic-minded fixer, swooping in the moment the system creaks. Murdoch’s phrasing is small but loaded. “When I hear” narrows accountability to what reaches his ear, implying distance from the machinery that produces the problem. It’s a posture of plausible deniability paired with decisive authority: if a mess exists, it’s because he wasn’t informed; once informed, order will be restored.
“Insist” is the key verb. It doesn’t promise investigation, deliberation, or humility; it promises pressure. That’s classic newsroom and boardroom language, where power often operates through insistence rather than argument. The passive construction “being put right” neatly removes the agent. Who put it wrong? Who will put it right? The sentence refuses to say. That omission is strategic: it recasts the speaker as the guarantor of outcomes without tying him to the methods or to the people who enact them.
In the context of Murdoch’s career - a publisher whose influence routinely blurs the boundary between reporting and agenda-setting - the quote reads less like managerial tidiness and more like a philosophy of intervention. It gestures at a moral compass (“wrong” versus “right”) while keeping the definition of those terms entirely in-house. For admirers, it’s competence and intolerance for dysfunction. For critics, it’s a clean, almost paternal slogan for editorial muscle: the assurance that if reality doesn’t cooperate, someone will be instructed to adjust it.
“Insist” is the key verb. It doesn’t promise investigation, deliberation, or humility; it promises pressure. That’s classic newsroom and boardroom language, where power often operates through insistence rather than argument. The passive construction “being put right” neatly removes the agent. Who put it wrong? Who will put it right? The sentence refuses to say. That omission is strategic: it recasts the speaker as the guarantor of outcomes without tying him to the methods or to the people who enact them.
In the context of Murdoch’s career - a publisher whose influence routinely blurs the boundary between reporting and agenda-setting - the quote reads less like managerial tidiness and more like a philosophy of intervention. It gestures at a moral compass (“wrong” versus “right”) while keeping the definition of those terms entirely in-house. For admirers, it’s competence and intolerance for dysfunction. For critics, it’s a clean, almost paternal slogan for editorial muscle: the assurance that if reality doesn’t cooperate, someone will be instructed to adjust it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Rupert
Add to List
