"When I was teaching in the 1960s in Boston, there was a great deal of hope in the air. Martin Luther King Jr. was alive, Malcolm X was alive; great, great leaders were emerging from the southern freedom movement"
About this Quote
Hope here isn’t a warm glow; it’s an atmosphere you could breathe, and Kozol makes you feel how quickly that air can thin out. By anchoring the memory in “teaching in the 1960s in Boston,” he quietly corrects a common myth that civil-rights history is a southern postcard. Boston - liberal on paper, segregated in practice - becomes a telling vantage point for a teacher watching national upheaval collide with local institutions. The classroom is implied as both refuge and battleground: where ideals are discussed, and where the limits of those ideals are enforced.
The repetition of “alive” does the real work. It’s not simple biography; it’s a metronome of contingency. This era’s “great deal of hope” depended on particular bodies being present, speaking, organizing, taking up space. Naming King and Malcolm X together is also a deliberate bridge-building move. Kozol refuses the tidy civics-lesson split between “acceptable” and “radical” Black leadership, collapsing the distance between moral suasion and militant critique into a single sentence of possibility. That pairing signals a movement ecosystem rather than a lone hero narrative.
The subtext is elegiac without announcing itself: hope is framed as something that existed before assassination, backlash, and the long, bureaucratic grind of inequality. “Emerging from the southern freedom movement” underscores that leadership was produced by struggle, not bestowed by institutions - a pointed reminder, from a writer steeped in educational inequality, that progress is made bottom-up, then fought over everywhere else.
The repetition of “alive” does the real work. It’s not simple biography; it’s a metronome of contingency. This era’s “great deal of hope” depended on particular bodies being present, speaking, organizing, taking up space. Naming King and Malcolm X together is also a deliberate bridge-building move. Kozol refuses the tidy civics-lesson split between “acceptable” and “radical” Black leadership, collapsing the distance between moral suasion and militant critique into a single sentence of possibility. That pairing signals a movement ecosystem rather than a lone hero narrative.
The subtext is elegiac without announcing itself: hope is framed as something that existed before assassination, backlash, and the long, bureaucratic grind of inequality. “Emerging from the southern freedom movement” underscores that leadership was produced by struggle, not bestowed by institutions - a pointed reminder, from a writer steeped in educational inequality, that progress is made bottom-up, then fought over everywhere else.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jonathan
Add to List


