"When I'm winning, winning, winning with a certain way why would I mess with that? When I realised there was lot to be gained from failing in some people's eyes, it made it all the more interesting!"
About this Quote
Mould’s line catches the nervous tic at the heart of a rock career: the moment “winning” becomes a brand, and the brand becomes a trap. The first sentence is pure momentum logic, the creed of touring bands and self-made scenes - if the formula is working, don’t touch it. It’s not laziness so much as survival. In music, consistency pays the rent, keeps the audience, satisfies labels, and quiets the internal panic that you might never hit that sweet spot again.
Then he flips the table. “Failing in some people’s eyes” is the tell: failure isn’t an objective event, it’s a social verdict. Mould is pointing to a cultural economy where credibility is often earned by refusing the obvious win. In punk and indie adjacent worlds - the ones Mould helped shape with Husker Du and later Sugar - “success” can read as compromise, and experimentation can be treated as betrayal. So if a segment of the audience is going to call any evolution a failure anyway, there’s leverage in that. You can spend the so-called loss.
The quote works because it’s both defensive and liberated. He admits the seduction of the streak - the ego, the safety, the groove - while suggesting an artist can weaponize disdain as creative oxygen. It’s a pragmatic philosophy disguised as a shrug: once you understand that “winning” and “failing” are often just audience narratives, you can choose the narrative that buys you the most freedom.
Then he flips the table. “Failing in some people’s eyes” is the tell: failure isn’t an objective event, it’s a social verdict. Mould is pointing to a cultural economy where credibility is often earned by refusing the obvious win. In punk and indie adjacent worlds - the ones Mould helped shape with Husker Du and later Sugar - “success” can read as compromise, and experimentation can be treated as betrayal. So if a segment of the audience is going to call any evolution a failure anyway, there’s leverage in that. You can spend the so-called loss.
The quote works because it’s both defensive and liberated. He admits the seduction of the streak - the ego, the safety, the groove - while suggesting an artist can weaponize disdain as creative oxygen. It’s a pragmatic philosophy disguised as a shrug: once you understand that “winning” and “failing” are often just audience narratives, you can choose the narrative that buys you the most freedom.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning from Mistakes |
|---|
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List






