"When the federal government spends more each year than it collects in tax revenues, it has three choices: It can raise taxes, print money, or borrow money. While these actions may benefit politicians, all three options are bad for average Americans"
About this Quote
Ron Paul’s line lands like a tidy piece of fiscal triage: three options, all ugly, no loopholes. It’s the kind of framing that turns a messy, technocratic budget debate into an everyday moral story with clear villains and victims. The intent isn’t just to describe deficits; it’s to corner the reader into a libertarian conclusion: if government routinely spends more than it takes in, government itself becomes the problem.
The subtext is pure populist inversion. “May benefit politicians” casts deficits as a self-serving racket, where officeholders purchase applause now and outsource the bill later. It’s a move that collapses partisan difference into a single class interest: the political class versus “average Americans.” That phrase does heavy lifting. It implies a silent majority being quietly taxed through inflation, interest payments, or future austerity, even when taxes don’t go up today.
The rhetorical strength is the clean triad: raise taxes, print money, borrow money. It’s memorable, repeatable, and designed for television hits and campaign mailers. It also smooths over key complexities: borrowing can be countercyclical stabilization in a recession; “printing money” is a loaded shorthand for monetary policy; and taxes can be structured progressively. Paul’s point isn’t to adjudicate those nuances but to put every route on the same ethical plane: coercion, debasement, or indebtedness.
Context matters: Paul rose as a post-Vietnam, post-Nixon skeptic of centralized power, later supercharged by late-20th-century inflation fears and, in the 2000s, by ballooning deficits and the politics of bailouts. The quote channels that moment’s suspicion that Washington’s solutions always arrive as someone else’s problem.
The subtext is pure populist inversion. “May benefit politicians” casts deficits as a self-serving racket, where officeholders purchase applause now and outsource the bill later. It’s a move that collapses partisan difference into a single class interest: the political class versus “average Americans.” That phrase does heavy lifting. It implies a silent majority being quietly taxed through inflation, interest payments, or future austerity, even when taxes don’t go up today.
The rhetorical strength is the clean triad: raise taxes, print money, borrow money. It’s memorable, repeatable, and designed for television hits and campaign mailers. It also smooths over key complexities: borrowing can be countercyclical stabilization in a recession; “printing money” is a loaded shorthand for monetary policy; and taxes can be structured progressively. Paul’s point isn’t to adjudicate those nuances but to put every route on the same ethical plane: coercion, debasement, or indebtedness.
Context matters: Paul rose as a post-Vietnam, post-Nixon skeptic of centralized power, later supercharged by late-20th-century inflation fears and, in the 2000s, by ballooning deficits and the politics of bailouts. The quote channels that moment’s suspicion that Washington’s solutions always arrive as someone else’s problem.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Ron
Add to List
