"When you are winning a war almost everything that happens can be claimed to be right and wise"
About this Quote
Victory changes the standard by which actions are judged. When events turn in your favor, decisions that were risky, improvised, or dubious can be recast as shrewd and inevitable. Churchill points to the moral and intellectual halo that success confers. The key is the word "almost": he signals a warning as much as a truism. Winning creates a powerful narrative that makes criticism look pedantic and dissent unpatriotic, yet that narrative can be misleading about the actual wisdom of the choices made.
Wartime magnifies this effect. The fog of war hides information, and leaders must gamble. If the gamble pays off, the backstory is tidied up and the uncertainties are forgotten. If it fails, the same reasoning is condemned as folly. Churchill knew both outcomes. He carried scars from the Dardanelles disaster in World War I, when grand strategy turned to calamity and reputations suffered. He also knew the intoxicating vindication of 1940-45, when British endurance and strategic risk-taking were woven into a triumphal story. His observation is less a celebration of the winners than a reminder that success distorts memory.
The line also comments on power. Winning gives governments latitude to define reality: propaganda sounds like public information, harsh measures like necessary discipline, collateral damage like the price of victory. Domestic politics reflect the same pattern. High approval ratings and battlefield gains can anesthetize scrutiny. Policies that would be contested in defeat slide by under the cover of momentum.
There is a broader human lesson here. We are prone to hindsight bias and to the comforting notion that outcomes certify methods. Churchill implies a test against that bias: ask whether we would judge the decision wise had it failed, and whether the rationale stands on its own merits. Prudence and ethics require standards that do not shift with fortune. Winning may quiet doubts, but it does not abolish them.
Wartime magnifies this effect. The fog of war hides information, and leaders must gamble. If the gamble pays off, the backstory is tidied up and the uncertainties are forgotten. If it fails, the same reasoning is condemned as folly. Churchill knew both outcomes. He carried scars from the Dardanelles disaster in World War I, when grand strategy turned to calamity and reputations suffered. He also knew the intoxicating vindication of 1940-45, when British endurance and strategic risk-taking were woven into a triumphal story. His observation is less a celebration of the winners than a reminder that success distorts memory.
The line also comments on power. Winning gives governments latitude to define reality: propaganda sounds like public information, harsh measures like necessary discipline, collateral damage like the price of victory. Domestic politics reflect the same pattern. High approval ratings and battlefield gains can anesthetize scrutiny. Policies that would be contested in defeat slide by under the cover of momentum.
There is a broader human lesson here. We are prone to hindsight bias and to the comforting notion that outcomes certify methods. Churchill implies a test against that bias: ask whether we would judge the decision wise had it failed, and whether the rationale stands on its own merits. Prudence and ethics require standards that do not shift with fortune. Winning may quiet doubts, but it does not abolish them.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Winston
Add to List









