"When you get too big a majority, you're immediately in trouble.'"
About this Quote
Sam Rayburn, the legendary Speaker of the U.S. House, knew that governing often gets harder, not easier, when your numbers swell. A huge majority tempts overreach, blurs accountability, and multiplies internal conflicts. With a narrow margin, a caucus tends to stay disciplined, bargaining carefully and focusing on a few achievable goals. With an overwhelming margin, expectations skyrocket, every faction demands its prize, and leaders suddenly manage a coalition of coalitions rather than a single party.
There is a psychological trap: large numbers breed complacency and hubris. The public, seeing overwhelming control, assumes you can deliver everything you promised. Failure becomes more visible and less forgivable, because there is no plausible foil to blame. At the same time, legislative mechanics get messy. Members from safe districts push ideological purity; members from swing districts demand moderation. Committee chairs guard turf, regional blocs trade favors, and party whips lose leverage because any individual lawmaker feels dispensable. Paradoxically, defections rise when the margin is large, because each defector believes the bill will pass without them.
History vindicates Rayburns caution. After the Democratic landslide of 1936, New Deal unity fractured as a conservative coalition of Republicans and Southern Democrats slowed Franklin Roosevelts agenda. The Democratic supermajority of 2009 faced bruising intraparty fights over health care and climate policy, and its ambitious program fueled a backlash in 2010. Republicans, despite unified control in 2017, struggled to repeal the Affordable Care Act because their enlarged conference spanned irreconcilable wings.
Rayburns line is not an argument against winning big; it is a warning about the management costs of victory. Big majorities magnify diversity, raise the price of consensus, and shift all responsibility onto those in charge. The remedy is vigilance against overreach, respect for coalition maintenance, and a disciplined sense of limits. Power expands capacity, but it also expands complexity. The larger the majority, the more artful the leadership must be.
There is a psychological trap: large numbers breed complacency and hubris. The public, seeing overwhelming control, assumes you can deliver everything you promised. Failure becomes more visible and less forgivable, because there is no plausible foil to blame. At the same time, legislative mechanics get messy. Members from safe districts push ideological purity; members from swing districts demand moderation. Committee chairs guard turf, regional blocs trade favors, and party whips lose leverage because any individual lawmaker feels dispensable. Paradoxically, defections rise when the margin is large, because each defector believes the bill will pass without them.
History vindicates Rayburns caution. After the Democratic landslide of 1936, New Deal unity fractured as a conservative coalition of Republicans and Southern Democrats slowed Franklin Roosevelts agenda. The Democratic supermajority of 2009 faced bruising intraparty fights over health care and climate policy, and its ambitious program fueled a backlash in 2010. Republicans, despite unified control in 2017, struggled to repeal the Affordable Care Act because their enlarged conference spanned irreconcilable wings.
Rayburns line is not an argument against winning big; it is a warning about the management costs of victory. Big majorities magnify diversity, raise the price of consensus, and shift all responsibility onto those in charge. The remedy is vigilance against overreach, respect for coalition maintenance, and a disciplined sense of limits. Power expands capacity, but it also expands complexity. The larger the majority, the more artful the leadership must be.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Sam
Add to List
