"When you make the sacrifice in marriage, you're sacrificing not to each other but to unity in a relationship"
About this Quote
Campbell’s line tries to rescue “sacrifice” from its most common marital misuse: the petty accounting of who gave up more. By redirecting the offering away from “each other” and toward “unity,” he’s reframing marriage as a third thing - not a tug-of-war between two sovereign egos, but a shared form you both agree to serve. It’s a mythologist’s move: turn a domestic problem into a ritual act, where the point isn’t loss but transformation.
The intent is almost corrective. “Sacrifice” in modern relationships often sounds like self-erasure or martyrdom, a prelude to resentment. Campbell flips it into a chosen discipline: you’re not paying a partner; you’re investing in the bond. The subtext is that the enemy isn’t your spouse’s flaws, it’s the default drift toward separateness - the constant, culturally encouraged insistence on total self-determination. Unity here isn’t sentimental fusion; it’s a negotiated allegiance to something bigger than preference in the moment.
Context matters: Campbell wrote in the mid-century U.S., when marriage was both idealized and rigidly scripted. His mythic framework offers an escape hatch from pure social conformity. Still, the line carries a risk: “unity” can become a moral bludgeon, used to silence dissent or justify lopsided compromise. At its best, though, it names a hard truth about intimacy: lasting partnership demands recurring, voluntary reductions of ego, not for the other person’s comfort, but for the relationship’s continued existence as a living, shared project.
The intent is almost corrective. “Sacrifice” in modern relationships often sounds like self-erasure or martyrdom, a prelude to resentment. Campbell flips it into a chosen discipline: you’re not paying a partner; you’re investing in the bond. The subtext is that the enemy isn’t your spouse’s flaws, it’s the default drift toward separateness - the constant, culturally encouraged insistence on total self-determination. Unity here isn’t sentimental fusion; it’s a negotiated allegiance to something bigger than preference in the moment.
Context matters: Campbell wrote in the mid-century U.S., when marriage was both idealized and rigidly scripted. His mythic framework offers an escape hatch from pure social conformity. Still, the line carries a risk: “unity” can become a moral bludgeon, used to silence dissent or justify lopsided compromise. At its best, though, it names a hard truth about intimacy: lasting partnership demands recurring, voluntary reductions of ego, not for the other person’s comfort, but for the relationship’s continued existence as a living, shared project.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marriage |
|---|
More Quotes by Joseph
Add to List







