"When you read about a car crash in which two or three youngsters are killed, do you pause to dwell on the amount of love and treasure and patience parents poured into bodies no longer suitable for open caskets?"
About this Quote
Bishop doesn’t let you consume tragedy the way newspapers are designed to be consumed: quickly, cleanly, at arm’s length. He takes the stock car-crash brief - the kind that reduces lives to ages and a blunt body count - and forces a grotesque recalibration. The question isn’t “Do you feel sad?” It’s “Do you really understand what you’re skimming past?” By yoking “love and treasure and patience” to “bodies no longer suitable for open caskets,” he collapses the distance between domestic devotion and public spectacle. The tenderness of parental investment meets the blunt, almost clinical violence of aftermath.
The intent is moral ambush. Bishop’s journalism, rooted in mid-century American print culture, is steeped in the belief that readers can be shamed into attention. Car culture and youth death were becoming grimly familiar by the postwar decades; wrecks were routine, and routine is how empathy dies. Bishop fights that numbness by making the reader picture not the crash but the years before it: packed lunches, night drives, braces, arguments, college hopes. “Poured into” is doing heavy work - it treats parenting as a long, irrevocable transfer of self.
The subtext is a quiet indictment of how modern society metabolizes loss: we tally casualties, we move on, we call it “accidents” as if no one built the roads, sold the speed, shrugged at the risks. His question is less about curiosity than complicity, asking whether our casual reading is another small violence layered onto the first.
The intent is moral ambush. Bishop’s journalism, rooted in mid-century American print culture, is steeped in the belief that readers can be shamed into attention. Car culture and youth death were becoming grimly familiar by the postwar decades; wrecks were routine, and routine is how empathy dies. Bishop fights that numbness by making the reader picture not the crash but the years before it: packed lunches, night drives, braces, arguments, college hopes. “Poured into” is doing heavy work - it treats parenting as a long, irrevocable transfer of self.
The subtext is a quiet indictment of how modern society metabolizes loss: we tally casualties, we move on, we call it “accidents” as if no one built the roads, sold the speed, shrugged at the risks. His question is less about curiosity than complicity, asking whether our casual reading is another small violence layered onto the first.
Quote Details
| Topic | Mortality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List







