"When you're working with a smaller budget I suppose one of the things that has to be in your mind when you are writing is that you have to keep the characters down to a minimum"
About this Quote
Budget isn’t just a production constraint here; it’s a narrative weapon. Atom Egoyan’s line reads like practical advice, but the subtext is more pointed: when money tightens, storytelling stops being about what you’d like to do and becomes about what you can make inevitable. “Keep the characters down to a minimum” is less an aesthetic preference than a recognition that every additional person on screen multiplies costs and complexity - and, crucially, diffuses attention.
Coming from a director associated with controlled, psychologically intricate films, Egoyan is implicitly defending a certain kind of cinema: intimate, claustrophobic, built around pressure rather than spectacle. Fewer characters means fewer plot detours, fewer locations, fewer logistical compromises. It also means each character has to carry more weight. You can’t hide thin writing behind a crowd scene; you’re forced into sharper motivations, cleaner arcs, and dialogue that does more than pass the time.
There’s a quiet politics to it, too. In an industry where “bigger” often masquerades as “better,” Egoyan reframes limitation as discipline. The line nods to the independent filmmaker’s reality - financing, casting, scheduling - while suggesting that constraint can produce a distinct emotional texture: a tighter circle of people where secrets ferment, power dynamics sharpen, and the camera lingers long enough to make discomfort meaningful.
It’s a reminder that scale isn’t neutral. It changes the kind of stories you’re even able to tell, and the kinds of truths a film can afford to stare at.
Coming from a director associated with controlled, psychologically intricate films, Egoyan is implicitly defending a certain kind of cinema: intimate, claustrophobic, built around pressure rather than spectacle. Fewer characters means fewer plot detours, fewer locations, fewer logistical compromises. It also means each character has to carry more weight. You can’t hide thin writing behind a crowd scene; you’re forced into sharper motivations, cleaner arcs, and dialogue that does more than pass the time.
There’s a quiet politics to it, too. In an industry where “bigger” often masquerades as “better,” Egoyan reframes limitation as discipline. The line nods to the independent filmmaker’s reality - financing, casting, scheduling - while suggesting that constraint can produce a distinct emotional texture: a tighter circle of people where secrets ferment, power dynamics sharpen, and the camera lingers long enough to make discomfort meaningful.
It’s a reminder that scale isn’t neutral. It changes the kind of stories you’re even able to tell, and the kinds of truths a film can afford to stare at.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Atom
Add to List



