"When you're writing for newspapers you have all these parameters. You can't swear, you have to use short paragraphs, all that. If you stay within those parameters, you have lots of freedom because you're writing for the next day"
About this Quote
Klosterman is sneaking a heresy past the gatekeepers: constraints don’t kill creativity; they launder it into something publishable, fast, and oddly liberating. The line reads like a defense of the much-maligned newspaper box score of culture writing: word counts, house style, the implied ban on certain kinds of honesty (swearing is a stand-in for the whole category of “uneditable” voice). Yet his punch is that the cage comes with an open door. If you accept the rules, you get a rare privilege in media: immediacy.
The subtext is about time as an editorial parameter. “Freedom” here isn’t some romantic authorial sovereignty; it’s the freedom to be wrong tomorrow without it becoming a life sentence. Writing “for the next day” lowers the stakes in a way that encourages risk: you can take a sharp angle, make an audacious connection, try a joke that might not survive in a more permanent venue. The newspaper’s built-in disposability becomes a creative asset, not a limitation.
Context matters because Klosterman emerged from a late-20th-century ecosystem where criticism was both industrial (deadlines, column inches) and communal (everyone reading roughly the same artifacts at roughly the same time). He’s gesturing at a vanished bargain: the editor trims your edges, but the culture is still synchronized enough that your trimmed thought can land with impact. In an era of infinite digital space and permanent archives, his point feels almost perverse: the tighter the form, the freer the writer.
The subtext is about time as an editorial parameter. “Freedom” here isn’t some romantic authorial sovereignty; it’s the freedom to be wrong tomorrow without it becoming a life sentence. Writing “for the next day” lowers the stakes in a way that encourages risk: you can take a sharp angle, make an audacious connection, try a joke that might not survive in a more permanent venue. The newspaper’s built-in disposability becomes a creative asset, not a limitation.
Context matters because Klosterman emerged from a late-20th-century ecosystem where criticism was both industrial (deadlines, column inches) and communal (everyone reading roughly the same artifacts at roughly the same time). He’s gesturing at a vanished bargain: the editor trims your edges, but the culture is still synchronized enough that your trimmed thought can land with impact. In an era of infinite digital space and permanent archives, his point feels almost perverse: the tighter the form, the freer the writer.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Chuck
Add to List
