"Where he was, where his cells were, where his logistical channels were, how he communicated. Who his allies were. Who donated to them. I think it's fair to say the entire range of sources were brought to bear"
About this Quote
There is a bureaucrat's chill in Scheuer's cadence: a man reduced to coordinates, cells, channels, communications. The sentence structure is a checklist, not a narrative, and that is the point. It performs competence. Each clause tightens the net, suggesting a surveillance state that is not improvising but methodically inventorying a target's life as a system. You can hear the institutional mindset at work: if you can map the logistics, you can own the man.
The phrase "the entire range of sources were brought to bear" is where the moral weight hides. It's passive voice with purpose, sanding off agency and accountability. "Sources" is an antiseptic euphemism that bundles everything together: intercepts, informants, foreign partners, financial tracking, coercive interrogations, gray-market deals. By not naming methods, he implies thoroughness while avoiding the political landmines attached to how thoroughness is achieved.
Contextually, Scheuer is speaking from the post-9/11 counterterror worldview, when intelligence culture tried to convince the public and policymakers that omnivorous collection equaled strategic clarity. The subtext is confidence pitched as reassurance: we looked everywhere, we used everything, we left no blind spots. But it also telegraphs how power justifies itself. When the "range of sources" is unlimited, limits become the only missing data point. The target is framed as a network to be dismantled; the state is framed as a machine that can, and therefore should, see all.
The phrase "the entire range of sources were brought to bear" is where the moral weight hides. It's passive voice with purpose, sanding off agency and accountability. "Sources" is an antiseptic euphemism that bundles everything together: intercepts, informants, foreign partners, financial tracking, coercive interrogations, gray-market deals. By not naming methods, he implies thoroughness while avoiding the political landmines attached to how thoroughness is achieved.
Contextually, Scheuer is speaking from the post-9/11 counterterror worldview, when intelligence culture tried to convince the public and policymakers that omnivorous collection equaled strategic clarity. The subtext is confidence pitched as reassurance: we looked everywhere, we used everything, we left no blind spots. But it also telegraphs how power justifies itself. When the "range of sources" is unlimited, limits become the only missing data point. The target is framed as a network to be dismantled; the state is framed as a machine that can, and therefore should, see all.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List







