"Where the stakes are the highest, in the war on terror, we cannot possibly succeed without extraordinary international cooperation. Effective international police actions require the highest degree of intelligence sharing, planning and collaborative enforcement"
About this Quote
Obama is selling a hard truth in the most careful language possible: in a borderless fight, sovereignty becomes negotiable. The phrase "where the stakes are the highest" is a rhetorical throat-clear, a way to pre-empt civil-liberties objections by framing counterterrorism as an exceptional arena where normal anxieties about privacy, jurisdiction, and due process must yield. He doesn’t argue that cooperation is good; he argues it’s mathematically unavoidable: "cannot possibly succeed". That absolute phrasing is the pressure point, turning international partnership from a diplomatic preference into an operational prerequisite.
The subtext is aimed at two audiences at once. To allies, it’s an invitation and a subtle reprimand: stop hoarding intelligence, stop freelancing, stop treating U.S. requests as optional. To domestic listeners, it’s reassurance that the post-9/11 security state can be made more legitimate by dispersing it across institutions and partners, recasting unilateral American action as coordinated "police" work. Notice the choice of "international police actions" rather than "war" actions: it quietly narrows the moral frame from open-ended conflict to law enforcement, signaling Obama’s brand of counterterrorism - technocratic, networked, less theatrical than "shock and awe", but not necessarily less aggressive.
Context matters: this is a post-Bush reset message, but not a retreat. Obama is trying to keep the machinery of counterterrorism running while changing its optics and governance. "Intelligence sharing, planning and collaborative enforcement" reads like bureaucratic choreography, yet it’s also a warning: the next failure won’t be blamed on a lack of courage, but on a breakdown in coordination.
The subtext is aimed at two audiences at once. To allies, it’s an invitation and a subtle reprimand: stop hoarding intelligence, stop freelancing, stop treating U.S. requests as optional. To domestic listeners, it’s reassurance that the post-9/11 security state can be made more legitimate by dispersing it across institutions and partners, recasting unilateral American action as coordinated "police" work. Notice the choice of "international police actions" rather than "war" actions: it quietly narrows the moral frame from open-ended conflict to law enforcement, signaling Obama’s brand of counterterrorism - technocratic, networked, less theatrical than "shock and awe", but not necessarily less aggressive.
Context matters: this is a post-Bush reset message, but not a retreat. Obama is trying to keep the machinery of counterterrorism running while changing its optics and governance. "Intelligence sharing, planning and collaborative enforcement" reads like bureaucratic choreography, yet it’s also a warning: the next failure won’t be blamed on a lack of courage, but on a breakdown in coordination.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Barack
Add to List

