"Whether we knew many who died on September 11 or personally knew none, we all lost something on that day. Innocence. Security. A trust that our homeland would always be safe"
About this Quote
Taft’s line does the politician’s hardest job after catastrophe: turn private grief into a shared civic story without sounding like he’s taking attendance at tragedy. He opens by neutralizing the hierarchy of suffering - whether you knew victims or not - then pulls everyone into the same moral ledger: “we all lost something.” That “we” is the point. It makes national identity feel like a family unit, and it asks listeners to accept an emotional claim (loss) as a political premise (therefore, action).
The list that follows is a tidy escalation: “Innocence. Security. A trust...” Each fragment lands like a gavel strike, mimicking the blunt shock of the day while staying rhetorically clean. “Innocence” is the most loaded word here; it implies a before-and-after myth in which America was naive, even childlike, prior to being “awakened.” That framing can console, but it also quietly absolves: if we were innocent, then whatever comes next is response, not reckoning.
The subtext is policy permission. By defining the damage as psychological and existential rather than strictly physical, the quote widens what counts as legitimate repair. “A trust that our homeland would always be safe” is less about the impossibility of perfect safety than about the collapse of a national assumption - and it primes an audience to trade openness for protection. In the post-9/11 context, that trade wasn’t abstract; it was airports, surveillance, wars, and a rebranded idea of citizenship built around vigilance. Taft packages that shift in three spare sentences that feel like mourning, but function like mandate.
The list that follows is a tidy escalation: “Innocence. Security. A trust...” Each fragment lands like a gavel strike, mimicking the blunt shock of the day while staying rhetorically clean. “Innocence” is the most loaded word here; it implies a before-and-after myth in which America was naive, even childlike, prior to being “awakened.” That framing can console, but it also quietly absolves: if we were innocent, then whatever comes next is response, not reckoning.
The subtext is policy permission. By defining the damage as psychological and existential rather than strictly physical, the quote widens what counts as legitimate repair. “A trust that our homeland would always be safe” is less about the impossibility of perfect safety than about the collapse of a national assumption - and it primes an audience to trade openness for protection. In the post-9/11 context, that trade wasn’t abstract; it was airports, surveillance, wars, and a rebranded idea of citizenship built around vigilance. Taft packages that shift in three spare sentences that feel like mourning, but function like mandate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List



