"Who ever said that pleasure wasn't functional?"
About this Quote
Eames’s intent is less hedonistic than tactical. Pleasure, for him, isn’t frosting; it’s part of the machine. If a chair invites you to sit, if a toy-like form makes you curious, if a material feels good in the hand, those sensations do real work: they produce use, attachment, care. A beautiful, enjoyable object gets kept, repaired, and lived with. That’s functional in the most ecological sense, decades before sustainability became a marketing category.
The subtext also defends the Eames worldview against both elitism and austerity. He and Ray Eames championed democratic design: mass-producible, high-performing objects that didn’t punish the body or the eye. In that context, “pleasure” isn’t luxury; it’s accessibility. A molded plywood chair that feels like it fits you is a quiet argument that everyday life deserves good design.
The quip’s brilliance is its inversion: it doesn’t argue that function can be pleasurable (the acceptable claim), but that pleasure itself is a form of function. It’s an ethical repositioning disguised as wit.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Eames, Charles. (2026, January 14). Who ever said that pleasure wasn't functional? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/who-ever-said-that-pleasure-wasnt-functional-21493/
Chicago Style
Eames, Charles. "Who ever said that pleasure wasn't functional?" FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/who-ever-said-that-pleasure-wasnt-functional-21493/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Who ever said that pleasure wasn't functional?" FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/who-ever-said-that-pleasure-wasnt-functional-21493/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2026.














