"Who, then, will govern? The answer must be, Man - for we have no angels in the shape of men, as yet, who are willing to take charge of our political affairs"
About this Quote
Johnson’s line carries the blunt, almost weary authority of a man arguing that politics is an inevitably human mess, not a moral pageant. The rhetorical move is classic: pose a lofty question about legitimacy, then puncture any fantasy of purity with a hard constraint - no angels available. It’s an appeal to realism, but also a preemptive defense of compromise, coercion, and the grubby mechanics of power.
The intent is twofold. First, it lowers the bar on purpose: if governors are merely “Man,” then expecting spotless virtue is childish. Second, it insists on continuity of rule. Government must proceed even when the candidates are flawed, even when the system is tense, even when the public wants redemption instead of administration.
The subtext gets sharper when you place Johnson in his actual moment: the wreckage of the Civil War and the vicious struggle over Reconstruction. Johnson repeatedly cast himself as the plain-spoken tribune of “ordinary” white Americans against what he framed as sanctimonious, overreaching reformers in Congress. “No angels” doubles as a jab at moral crusaders - the kind of people who speak in absolutes about justice, citizenship, and punishment. By recoding moral ambition as naive idealism, he licenses a politics of limits: quick reconciliation, minimal federal intervention, and a tolerance for the existing racial order.
It works because it sounds humble while asserting control. The line invites the audience to relax their moral vigilance: don’t look for angels, accept the men you’ve got. In Johnson’s hands, that realism becomes a weapon - not against corruption, but against accountability.
The intent is twofold. First, it lowers the bar on purpose: if governors are merely “Man,” then expecting spotless virtue is childish. Second, it insists on continuity of rule. Government must proceed even when the candidates are flawed, even when the system is tense, even when the public wants redemption instead of administration.
The subtext gets sharper when you place Johnson in his actual moment: the wreckage of the Civil War and the vicious struggle over Reconstruction. Johnson repeatedly cast himself as the plain-spoken tribune of “ordinary” white Americans against what he framed as sanctimonious, overreaching reformers in Congress. “No angels” doubles as a jab at moral crusaders - the kind of people who speak in absolutes about justice, citizenship, and punishment. By recoding moral ambition as naive idealism, he licenses a politics of limits: quick reconciliation, minimal federal intervention, and a tolerance for the existing racial order.
It works because it sounds humble while asserting control. The line invites the audience to relax their moral vigilance: don’t look for angels, accept the men you’ve got. In Johnson’s hands, that realism becomes a weapon - not against corruption, but against accountability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Andrew
Add to List
