"Who will wear a shoe that hurts him, because the shoe-maker tells him 'tis well made?"
About this Quote
A well-made shoe that still hurts is the kind of “quality” tyrants love: impressive on paper, intolerable on the body. Algernon Sidney’s line is a compact demolition of deferential politics. He takes legitimacy out of the abstract and drags it down to the foot. You don’t owe loyalty to a constitution, a king, or a policy because an expert assures you it’s properly crafted. You owe attention to what it does to you.
The intent is pointedly anti-authoritarian, but it’s also anti-mystification. By choosing a shoe-maker, Sidney skewers the whole class of intermediaries who claim specialized authority over public life: court intellectuals, royal lawyers, the “reasonable” moderates who insist the system is sound even as it blisters. The metaphor works because it’s domestic and unavoidable. Political theory can be debated; pain is harder to gaslight.
Sidney wrote as a parliamentarian and republican in a century when England was fighting over where power originates - divine right or popular consent. His broader project (later distilled in Discourses Concerning Government) argued that rulers are accountable, and that a people can withdraw obedience when government becomes injurious. The subtext is a warning: expertise and craftsmanship are not moral alibis. A regime can be elegantly designed and still illegitimate if it produces suffering.
There’s bite here, too: if you keep limping because the shoe is “well made,” you’re not merely oppressed - you’re complicit in your own discomfort. Sidney is not asking for better salesmanship. He’s urging refusal.
The intent is pointedly anti-authoritarian, but it’s also anti-mystification. By choosing a shoe-maker, Sidney skewers the whole class of intermediaries who claim specialized authority over public life: court intellectuals, royal lawyers, the “reasonable” moderates who insist the system is sound even as it blisters. The metaphor works because it’s domestic and unavoidable. Political theory can be debated; pain is harder to gaslight.
Sidney wrote as a parliamentarian and republican in a century when England was fighting over where power originates - divine right or popular consent. His broader project (later distilled in Discourses Concerning Government) argued that rulers are accountable, and that a people can withdraw obedience when government becomes injurious. The subtext is a warning: expertise and craftsmanship are not moral alibis. A regime can be elegantly designed and still illegitimate if it produces suffering.
There’s bite here, too: if you keep limping because the shoe is “well made,” you’re not merely oppressed - you’re complicit in your own discomfort. Sidney is not asking for better salesmanship. He’s urging refusal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Algernon
Add to List










