"Whoever called snooker 'chess with balls' was rude, but right"
About this Quote
The phrase “chess with balls” works because it collapses two cultural worlds that like to pretend they don’t mix. Chess carries the perfume of seriousness, education, and quiet heroism. Snooker, despite its genuine intricacy, gets coded as leisure, smoke, pubs, working-class patience. By yoking them together, James exposes how status is assigned less by complexity than by context and costume. The joke isn’t that snooker is simple; it’s that we need a “chess” analogy to grant it dignity.
There’s also a sly correction embedded in the insult. Snooker really is a game of planning, positional play, traps, and psychological pressure; its drama is often in what you deny the opponent, not what you score. Calling it chess with balls is “rude” because it suggests snooker borrows its intelligence from a higher art. Calling it “right” is James refusing to sentimentalize the boundary between high culture and popular sport. He’s arguing, with a grin, that strategy doesn’t become noble only when it’s played on a board in silence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Verified source: The Sound of the Crucible (Clive James, 1984)
Evidence: Whoever called snooker ‘chess with balls’ was rude but right. (Page 8 (as reprinted); first four sentences omitted in the newspaper printing per secondary documentation). This line is the opening sentence of Clive James’s snooker piece “The Sound of the Crucible”. A well-regarded secondary researcher (Edward Winter, Chess Notes) reports it was reproduced from The Observer (6 May 1984) and later collected in James’s book Snakecharmers in Texas (London, 1988/1989), where it appears as the first sentence on pp. 285–288. Winter also reports that The Observer printing did not include the first four sentences, i.e., the quote may not have appeared verbatim in the newspaper version even though the article was reprinted there. Separately, Winter reports the *phrase* “chess with balls” predates James and was attributed to Mike Watterson in The Guardian (3 April 1981, Cynthia Bateman, “Chess with balls”), meaning James likely popularized/repurposed an existing comparison rather than originating the underlying metaphor. Other candidates (1) Funny You Should Say That (Andrew Martin, 2006) compilation95.0% ... Whoever called snooker ' chess with balls ' was rude but right . Clive James Observer 6 May 1984 6 Cards don't re... |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
James, Clive. (2026, February 14). Whoever called snooker 'chess with balls' was rude, but right. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/whoever-called-snooker-chess-with-balls-was-rude-118378/
Chicago Style
James, Clive. "Whoever called snooker 'chess with balls' was rude, but right." FixQuotes. February 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/whoever-called-snooker-chess-with-balls-was-rude-118378/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Whoever called snooker 'chess with balls' was rude, but right." FixQuotes, 14 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/whoever-called-snooker-chess-with-balls-was-rude-118378/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2026.




